Tuning is certainly done. So now is as good a time as any I would say. Bill.
On 1 April 2014 01:23, Brian Gladman <b...@gladman.plus.com> wrote: > On 31/03/2014 23:46, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > Playing with different arch choices, it seems that x86_64w/gmp-mparam.h > > lacks a definition for FFT_N_NUM. > > There might be several like that in mpn/x86w and mpn/x86_64w because I > haven't copied over the tuning files from the equivalent GCC directories > (tuning on Windows is unreliable so we just use the GCC tuning files). > > I didn't want to do this piecemeal but it looks as if I should do it if > tuning is now close to complete. > > Brian > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
