> Why did he used memman? Isn't direct control of the Memory Mapper faster? The biggest advantage was that Memman can find ANY RAM present on the system. Not only mappers, but also old Sony and Philips RAM extensions. But not MegaRAM... Hmm, maybe we should extend MemMan so it can use MegaRAM as well? Anyone? Grtjs, Manuel PS: MSX 4 EVER! (Questions? See: http://www.faq.msxnet.org) PPS: Visit my homepage at http://www.sci.kun.nl/marie/home/manuelbi **** MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/) ****
- Re: MegaRAM (was: cracked 24k ROMs) Alwin Henseler
- Re: MegaRAM (was: cracked 24k RO... Marco Antonio Simon dal Poz
- Re: MegaRAM (was: cracked 24... Manuel Bilderbeek
- Re: MegaRAM (was: crack... Marco Antonio Simon dal Poz
- Re: MegaRAM (was: c... shevek
- Re: MegaRAM (was: c... student Wiskunde/Informatica
- Re: MegaRAM (was: c... Alex Wulms
- Re: MegaRAM (was: c... Marco Antonio Simon dal Poz
- Re: MegaRAM (was: c... Alex Wulms
- Re: MegaRAM (was: c... Marco Antonio Simon dal Poz
- Re: MegaRAM (was: c... Manuel Bilderbeek
- Re: MegaRAM (was: c... Marco Antonio Simon dal Poz
- Re: MegaRAM (was: c... Alex Wulms
- Re: MegaRAM (was: c... Marco Antonio Simon dal Poz
- Re: MegaRAM (was: c... shevek
- Cracked ROM in 24k portions jam
- Cracked ROM in 24k portions jam
- Re: Cracked ROM in 24k portions Ricardo Jurczyk Pinheiro
- Cracked ROM in 24k portions jam