On Fri, 5 Mar 1999, Alex Wulms wrote:
> ] Why did he used memman? Isn't direct control of the Memory Mapper faster?
> I used memman to make fastcopy compatible with any other memory hungry
> program that used memman. At the time that I wrote fasctopy 3.0, memman was
> still a very promising initiative. Too bad that most people choose to ignore
> it. Memman is fast enough for the memory mapper control. Provided that you
> use some tricks ;-). Perhaps that the need for these tricks where the main
> reason why most people ignored memman. It was rather complicated to support
> memman and still have a good performance.
Where can I find technical informations about MEMMAN?
Greetings from Brazil!
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Marco Antonio Simon Dal Poz http://www.lsi.usp.br/~mdalpoz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Apple" (c) Copyright 1767, Sir Isaac Newton
/"\
\ / CAMPANHA DA FITA ASCII - CONTRA MAIL HTML
X ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN - AGAINST HTML MAIL
/ \
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/)
****
