Indeed. This debate is getting tiresome. 

> On Aug 21, 2015, at 8:59 PM, <b...@bobhuff.com> <b...@bobhuff.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> From: Peter S <peter.schoffhau...@gmail.com>
> To: music-dsp@music.columbia.edu 
> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 6:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [music-dsp] Compensate for interpolation high frequency signal   
> loss
> 
> On 22/08/2015, Ethan Duni <ethan.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > We've been over this repeatedly, including in the very post you are
> > responding to. The fact that there are many ways to produce a graph of the
> > interpolation spectrum is not in dispute, nor is it germaine to my point.
> 
> Earlier you disputed that there's no upsampling involved.
> Apparently you change your mind quite often...
> 
> > It's seems like you are trying to
> > avoid my point entirely, in favor of some imaginary dispute of your own
> > invention, which you think you can "win."
> 
> I claimed something, and you disputed it. I proved that what I
> claimed, is true. Therefore, all your further arguments are invalid...
> (and are boring)
> 
> > I have no idea what you think you are proving by scrutinizing graph
> > artifacts like that
> 
> I am proving that what you see on the graph is not sinc(x) /
> sinc^2(x), but rather some noisy curve, like the spectrum of upsampled
> noise. Therefore, my original argument is correct.
> 
> > It's also in extremely poor taste to use "retard" as a term of abuse.
> 
> Well, if you do not see that the graph pictured on Olli's figure is
> not sinc(x), then you're retarded.
> 
> > Meanwhile, it seems that you are suggesting that the spectrum of white
> > noise linearly interpolated up to a high oversampling rate is not sinc^2.
> 
> Naturally, there's going to be some jaggedness in the spectrum because
> of the noise. So, obviously, that is not sinc^2 then.
> 
> > Are you claiming that those wiggles in the graph represent
> > aliasing of the spectrum from resampling at 44.1kHz? If so, that is
> > unlikely.
> 
> Nope, the "wiggles" in the graph are from the noise.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -P
> _______________________________________________
> music-dsp mailing list
> music-dsp@music.columbia.edu
> https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> music-dsp mailing list
> music-dsp@music.columbia.edu
> https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
_______________________________________________
music-dsp mailing list
music-dsp@music.columbia.edu
https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp

Reply via email to