Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote
>
> apart from the already existing "what's a medley" problem, are there
> any other issues people have with it?
>
I've been waiting for a dev response to the (possibly overly ambitious) join
phrases I suggested on March 5 and again on March 26:
practik wrote
>
> I think picking the right join phrases is the key to preventing confusion
> here. The potential trouble spots I see are "partial medley of" and
> "cover medley of," because the attributes would seem to apply to the
> entire medley, though really they only apply to parts of it.
>
> [...]
>
> EDIT: is a {*partial*} {live} {instrumental} {cover}
> {performance|*medley*} of
> RESULTS: (on release and recording pages) medley including parts of:, (on
> work pages) partially included in medleys:
>
> E: is a {partial} {*live*} {instrumental} {cover} {performance|*medley*}
> of
> R: live medley of:, included in live medleys:
>
> E: is a {partial} {live} {*instrumental*} {cover} {performance|*medley*}
> of
> R: instrumental medley of:, included in instrumental medleys
>
> E: is a {partial} {live} {instrumental} {*cover*} {performance|*medley*}
> of
> R: medley covering:, covered in medleys:
>
> E: is a {*partial*} {*live*} {*instrumental*} {*cover*}
> {performance|*medley*} of
> R: live instrumental medley covering parts of:, partially covered in live
> instrumental medleys
>
Hawke thought it might not be possible for join phrases to be that dynamic,
but we never got confirmation (or denial) of that.
Patrick
--
View this message in context:
http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFC-STYLE-97-Move-medley-to-an-attribute-of-performance-of-tp4408610p4634082.html
Sent from the Musicbrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
