Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote > > apart from the already existing "what's a medley" problem, are there > any other issues people have with it? >
I've been waiting for a dev response to the (possibly overly ambitious) join phrases I suggested on March 5 and again on March 26: practik wrote > > I think picking the right join phrases is the key to preventing confusion > here. The potential trouble spots I see are "partial medley of" and > "cover medley of," because the attributes would seem to apply to the > entire medley, though really they only apply to parts of it. > > [...] > > EDIT: is a {*partial*} {live} {instrumental} {cover} > {performance|*medley*} of > RESULTS: (on release and recording pages) medley including parts of:, (on > work pages) partially included in medleys: > > E: is a {partial} {*live*} {instrumental} {cover} {performance|*medley*} > of > R: live medley of:, included in live medleys: > > E: is a {partial} {live} {*instrumental*} {cover} {performance|*medley*} > of > R: instrumental medley of:, included in instrumental medleys > > E: is a {partial} {live} {instrumental} {*cover*} {performance|*medley*} > of > R: medley covering:, covered in medleys: > > E: is a {*partial*} {*live*} {*instrumental*} {*cover*} > {performance|*medley*} of > R: live instrumental medley covering parts of:, partially covered in live > instrumental medleys > Hawke thought it might not be possible for join phrases to be that dynamic, but we never got confirmation (or denial) of that. Patrick -- View this message in context: http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFC-STYLE-97-Move-medley-to-an-attribute-of-performance-of-tp4408610p4634082.html Sent from the Musicbrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style