On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria <davito...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Le 7 juil. 2013 13:46, "Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren" <reosare...@gmail.com> > a écrit : > > > > > On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria <davito...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> 2013/7/7 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <reosare...@gmail.com> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria < > davito...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> 2013/6/30 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <reosare...@gmail.com> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria < > davito...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I'm still missing something about recordings. Is this supposed to > apply to recordings or not? Your answer from june 13 seems to imply > recordings are included. If so, I think it should be mentioned. The problem > I see is that some users could think that they should use this for > recordings too while other users may think not, and pointless edit > discussions might ensue. > >>>>> > >>>>> Right now, no - that's why it explicitly mentions just tracks and > releases. Recordings are trickier since a) we don't have guidelines for > that now at all, except for the "live" comment thing, and b) they do have > disambiguation fields which means they will probably be dealt with > differently sometimes. So I was hoping to just improve the existing > guidelines, and leave the recording part of this to someone who has a > stronger opinion about it than I have - "er, dunno, do whatever I guess?" > isn't a great guideline text :) > >>>> > >>>> I understand this. What I meant is that I'm missing the mention that > this does not currently apply to recordings. I think this should be written > here. > >>> > >>> I don't know. I don't really like the idea of writing what the > guideline does not apply to when it already says what it does apply to - > but do other people find this confusing? Maybe I should do it whether I > like it or not, if it is. > >> > >> Put yourself in the shoes of a newbie or of a distracted user (such as > me :-P ) You are looking for Recordings ETI. Currently, the most obvious > page where ETI is mentioned is this one, no pages is about ETI for > Recordings, this one does not say that it does not apply to Recordings, so > the user would probably apply this guide. I don't think it would hurt much, > because the Recordings ETI guide will probably be close to this. Perhaps > adding a mention that this applies to Release and Track titles *only* would > be better than just saying it does not apply to Recordings. > > > > Hmm, I guess you're right. I've added a note, does that seem and read OK? > > > Yes. Once the guides for recordings are set, we can remove this. > Just to make sure, is that a +1 and can I move to RFV? :) -- Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
