On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria <davito...@gmail.com>wrote:
> 2013/6/30 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <reosare...@gmail.com> > >> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria < >> davito...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> 2013/6/27 Tom Crocker <tomcrockerm...@gmail.com> >>> >>>> Looks much better to me >>>> >>>> >>>> On 26 June 2013 22:32, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren >>>> <reosare...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Tom Crocker <tomcrockerm...@gmail.com >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I'm guessing that the guidance on case isn't meant to be different >>>>>> between ETI in general and remixes. Beyond the pointer to the oc remix >>>>>> series does the remix section need to be there? Isn't it covered above or >>>>>> could be if you put "(e.g. edit or (re)mix)" after the trackversion link? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Er... now that you mention it, it does seem quite redundant. I've >>>>> merged it all into 4 paragraphs, and I'd say it looks much more readable >>>>> now: >>>>> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Reosarevok/Titles/Extra_title_information >>>>> >>>>> Opinions? I won't fully reset the RFC since I didn't actually remove >>>>> stuff as much as reposition it, but I'll extend it a few days to Jun 30. >>>>> >>>> >>> I'm still missing something about recordings. Is this supposed to apply >>> to recordings or not? Your answer from june 13 seems to imply recordings >>> are included. If so, I think it should be mentioned. The problem I see is >>> that some users could think that they should use this for recordings too >>> while other users may think not, and pointless edit discussions might ensue. >>> >> >> Right now, no - that's why it explicitly mentions just tracks and >> releases. Recordings are trickier since a) we don't have guidelines for >> that now at all, except for the "live" comment thing, and b) they do have >> disambiguation fields which means they will probably be dealt with >> differently sometimes. So I was hoping to just improve the existing >> guidelines, and leave the recording part of this to someone who has a >> stronger opinion about it than I have - "er, dunno, do whatever I guess?" >> isn't a great guideline text :) >> > > I understand this. What I meant is that I'm missing the mention that this > does not currently apply to recordings. I think this should be written here. > I don't know. I don't really like the idea of writing what the guideline does not apply to when it already says what it does apply to - but do other people find this confusing? Maybe I should do it whether I like it or not, if it is. -- Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
