2013/7/16 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <reosare...@gmail.com> > > On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria > <davito...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Le 7 juil. 2013 13:46, "Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren" <reosare...@gmail.com> >> a écrit : >> > On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria < >> davito...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> 2013/7/7 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <reosare...@gmail.com> >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria < >> davito...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> 2013/6/30 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <reosare...@gmail.com> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria < >> davito...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> I'm still missing something about recordings. Is this supposed to >> apply to recordings or not? Your answer from june 13 seems to imply >> recordings are included. If so, I think it should be mentioned. The problem >> I see is that some users could think that they should use this for >> recordings too while other users may think not, and pointless edit >> discussions might ensue. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Right now, no - that's why it explicitly mentions just tracks and >> releases. Recordings are trickier since a) we don't have guidelines for >> that now at all, except for the "live" comment thing, and b) they do have >> disambiguation fields which means they will probably be dealt with >> differently sometimes. So I was hoping to just improve the existing >> guidelines, and leave the recording part of this to someone who has a >> stronger opinion about it than I have - "er, dunno, do whatever I guess?" >> isn't a great guideline text :) >> >>>> >> >>>> I understand this. What I meant is that I'm missing the mention that >> this does not currently apply to recordings. I think this should be written >> here. >> >>> >> >>> I don't know. I don't really like the idea of writing what the >> guideline does not apply to when it already says what it does apply to - >> but do other people find this confusing? Maybe I should do it whether I >> like it or not, if it is. >> >> >> >> Put yourself in the shoes of a newbie or of a distracted user (such as >> me :-P ) You are looking for Recordings ETI. Currently, the most obvious >> page where ETI is mentioned is this one, no pages is about ETI for >> Recordings, this one does not say that it does not apply to Recordings, so >> the user would probably apply this guide. I don't think it would hurt much, >> because the Recordings ETI guide will probably be close to this. Perhaps >> adding a mention that this applies to Release and Track titles *only* would >> be better than just saying it does not apply to Recordings. >> > >> > Hmm, I guess you're right. I've added a note, does that seem and read >> OK? >> >> >> Yes. Once the guides for recordings are set, we can remove this. >> > > Just to make sure, is that a +1 and can I move to RFV? :) >
Yes, of course. Sorry, I should have said so. -- Frederic Da Vitoria (davitof) Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - http://www.april.org
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
