2013/6/30 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <reosare...@gmail.com>

> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria <davito...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> 2013/6/27 Tom Crocker <tomcrockerm...@gmail.com>
>>
>>> Looks much better to me
>>>
>>>
>>> On 26 June 2013 22:32, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren 
>>> <reosare...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Tom Crocker 
>>>> <tomcrockerm...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm guessing that the guidance on case isn't meant to be different
>>>>> between ETI in general and remixes. Beyond the pointer to the oc remix
>>>>> series does the remix section need to be there? Isn't it covered above or
>>>>> could be if you put "(e.g. edit or (re)mix)" after the trackversion link?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Er... now that you mention it, it does seem quite redundant. I've
>>>> merged it all into 4 paragraphs, and I'd say it looks much more readable
>>>> now:
>>>> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Reosarevok/Titles/Extra_title_information
>>>>
>>>> Opinions? I won't fully reset the RFC since I didn't actually remove
>>>> stuff as much as reposition it, but I'll extend it a few days to Jun 30.
>>>>
>>>
>> I'm still missing something about recordings. Is this supposed to apply
>> to recordings or not? Your answer from june 13 seems to imply recordings
>> are included. If so, I think it should be mentioned. The problem I see is
>> that some users could think that they should use this for recordings too
>> while other users may think not, and pointless edit discussions might ensue.
>>
>
> Right now, no - that's why it explicitly mentions just tracks and
> releases. Recordings are trickier since a) we don't have guidelines for
> that now at all, except for the "live" comment thing, and b) they do have
> disambiguation fields which means they will probably be dealt with
> differently sometimes. So I was hoping to just improve the existing
> guidelines, and leave the recording part of this to someone who has a
> stronger opinion about it than I have - "er, dunno, do whatever I guess?"
> isn't a great guideline text :)
>

I understand this. What I meant is that I'm missing the mention that this
does not currently apply to recordings. I think this should be written here.

-- 
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)

Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org
_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Reply via email to