Scott V. McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Any ideas on not using a full blown MTA for outgoing mail? It seems > like overkill to run sendmail (or even qmail) on a single user system > when all I need is a program to look like sendmail but immediately > send mail to my isp's smtp server. What if your ISP's mail servers are down? Then you can't send mail anymore, until they come back. If you run a local MTA, it can bypass the ISP's servers, and go directly to the remote mail server. -- David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man really clever who has not Hewlett-Packard | found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson UX WTEC Engineer | PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44
- Re: New Mail Sent to differ... Mikko Hänninen
- Re: New Mail Sent to differ... Bennett Todd
- Re: New Mail Sent to differ... Brendan Cully
- Re: New Mail Sent to differ... Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Jeffrey L . Taylor
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailb... Scott V. McGuire
- Re: New Mail Sent to different ... Bennett Todd
- Re: New Mail Sent to differ... Scott V. McGuire
- Re: New Mail Sent to differ... brian moore
- Re: New Mail Sent to different ... Charles Cazabon
- Re: New Mail Sent to different ... David DeSimone
- Re: New Mail Sent to differ... Scott V. McGuire
- Re: New Mail Sent to differ... Charles Cazabon
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Jeremy Blosser
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes brian moore
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Matthew Hawkins
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Kurt
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Mikko Hänninen
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Nick Jennings