[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> I think if there was an option which would cause commands on tagged
> messages (initiated with ;) to simply do nothing if there was no tagged
> message, then it might work. I had a go at changing this behaviour in
> the source, but failed. (No wonder, C is to me like written Japanese: I
> sometimes can get the idea what it means, but I'm lost when the task is
> to also enhance it.)

It looks like curs_main.c:550 in my copy of mutt here, where it says:

        if (!Context->tagged)
        {
          mutt_error _("No tagged messages.");
          continue;
        }

You could try disabling that to see what happens ...

Edmund

Reply via email to