[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I think if there was an option which would cause commands on tagged > messages (initiated with ;) to simply do nothing if there was no tagged > message, then it might work. I had a go at changing this behaviour in > the source, but failed. (No wonder, C is to me like written Japanese: I > sometimes can get the idea what it means, but I'm lost when the task is > to also enhance it.) It looks like curs_main.c:550 in my copy of mutt here, where it says: if (!Context->tagged) { mutt_error _("No tagged messages."); continue; } You could try disabling that to see what happens ... Edmund
- Re: New Mail Sent to differ... Scott V. McGuire
- Re: New Mail Sent to differ... brian moore
- Re: New Mail Sent to different ... Charles Cazabon
- Re: New Mail Sent to different ... David DeSimone
- Re: New Mail Sent to differ... Scott V. McGuire
- Re: New Mail Sent to differ... Charles Cazabon
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Jeremy Blosser
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes brian moore
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Matthew Hawkins
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Kurt
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Mikko Hänninen
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Nick Jennings
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Shawn D. McPeek
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Nick Jennings
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailb... Jorge Godoy
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Jorge Godoy
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailb... Morten Bo Johansen
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Dan Lipofsky
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes brian moore