On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 11:23:37AM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote: > > I understand procmail doesn't go with IMAP at this point. But that doesn't > mean it makes sense for Mutt to do it. It's still the MDAs job to deliver > mail. As someone else mentioned, something should be written for IMAP to > fill this hole. It shouldn't be added to the MUAs. And it's being done, though it's still in the design stages. See, for example, http://www.imc.org/draft-showalter-sieve-main -- Brian Moore | Of course vi is God's editor. Sysadmin, C/Perl Hacker | If He used Emacs, He'd still be waiting Usenet Vandal | for it to load on the seventh day. Netscum, Bane of Elves.
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Jeffrey L . Taylor
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailb... Scott V. McGuire
- Re: New Mail Sent to different ... Bennett Todd
- Re: New Mail Sent to differ... Scott V. McGuire
- Re: New Mail Sent to differ... brian moore
- Re: New Mail Sent to different ... Charles Cazabon
- Re: New Mail Sent to different ... David DeSimone
- Re: New Mail Sent to differ... Scott V. McGuire
- Re: New Mail Sent to differ... Charles Cazabon
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Jeremy Blosser
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes brian moore
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Matthew Hawkins
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Kurt
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Mikko H�nninen
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Nick Jennings
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Shawn D. McPeek
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Nick Jennings
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailb... Jorge Godoy
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Jorge Godoy
