Edmund,
In my first tests this worked great. My original change was after this,
trying to 'eat up' the next input. But that didn't work nicely. This,
however seems to do what I was looking for just fine.
Thanks,
Kurt
On Fri, Jan 14, 2000 at 03:16:13PM +0000, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I think if there was an option which would cause commands on tagged
> > messages (initiated with ;) to simply do nothing if there was no tagged
> > message, then it might work.
>
> It looks like curs_main.c:550 in my copy of mutt here, where it says:
>
> if (!Context->tagged)
> {
> mutt_error _("No tagged messages.");
> continue;
> }
>
- Re: New Mail Sent to differ... brian moore
- Re: New Mail Sent to different ... Charles Cazabon
- Re: New Mail Sent to different ... David DeSimone
- Re: New Mail Sent to differ... Scott V. McGuire
- Re: New Mail Sent to differ... Charles Cazabon
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Jeremy Blosser
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes brian moore
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Matthew Hawkins
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Kurt
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Mikko H�nninen
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Nick Jennings
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Shawn D. McPeek
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Nick Jennings
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailb... Jorge Godoy
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Jorge Godoy
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailb... Morten Bo Johansen
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Dan Lipofsky
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes brian moore
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Nick Jennings
