On 19-Jun-2000, clemensF wrote:
> > I've converted my mailboxes to maildir once, it turned out to be
> > slower than mbox, so I converted back to mbox now. Dunno about MH, but
> > I'm guessing it's about the same speed as maildir since it resembles
> > maildir.
> are your files on a network?

Nope, so I guess there's no huge gain for me to switch to maildir.

I'm still wondering why it's slower though (in general), maybe because
it fopen() more times than mbox? The mailbox is on ext2fs if that
makes any difference.

        Ronny

Reply via email to