Michael, et al -- ...and then Michael Elkins said... % % This would not affect the PGP/MIME support at all. It will continue to
Oh, no; of course not. % function as it always has. I just don't think there is any value in % continuing to label application/pgp messages: you should either use PGP/MIME % or just clearsign the message without changing the content-type. My concern was simply that those mailers which cannot handle PGP/MIME (but which currently work with application/pgp) should not get broken by a move away from app/pgp (especially to make it easier for LookOut! users ;-) % % me HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg22651/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
