--KdquIMZPjGJQvRdI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Rob Reid spake thus:
> If mutt could pass variables like the current folder to the environment, =
then
> this "mutt needs a scripting language, but no, that's bloated, and
> which one would we use?" thread would probably recur less frequently.
I don't understand why mutt so desperately needs a scripting language.
What's wrong with the backtick evaluation that the .muttrc already has?
I can't think of anything that can be done with a scripting language
built into the .muttrc that can't be done with a bash script being
evaluated with backticks inside the regular .muttrc. (but then again, I
haven't put _too_much_ thought into it).
Care to give some examples?
--=20
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Microsoft is a cross between the Borg and the Ferengi. Unfortunately,
they use Borg to do their marketing and Ferengi to do their
programming.
-- Simon Slavin
--KdquIMZPjGJQvRdI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8nkCVPTh2iSBKeccRAkuAAJ45/CFP9giRPlEw5VO1BDTMGf7IbgCfaVMZ
5qIYuhrJ4qyu/1rQZxDtxDE=
=My32
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--KdquIMZPjGJQvRdI--
