On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 10:37:33AM -0500, Shawn McMahon wrote: > There's a better way, but more on that after we get your problem fixed. > Could you answer "yes" on a response to the list, so we can see what > you're sending out?
not sure what you mean here. do you want me to send a simple email from outlook or mutt? if mutt, does this suffice? or do you mean an inline sig from mutt? or...? > Also, are you getting any errors when you start Mutt? nope. mutt appears to be a happy camper. -- Peter Abplanalp Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP: pgp.mit.edu
msg26759/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
