begin quoting what Peter T. Abplanalp said on Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 08:58:21AM -0700: > > that is correct. p_c_t works fine for a simple email message without > any attachments; however, as soon as you add an attachment i think > mutt figures you're gonna send mime anyway so why not do the pgp that > way too.
Ah; didn't realize that was the problem you were describing. Yes, that's a limitation of the patch. That's what happens when you try to do something that isn't standardized; different people do it differently.
msg26762/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
