Akkana wrote: > On aanother thread, Simon White writes: > > I always hit L to reply to lists, and hope that Mutt will reply as > > intended. > I'm generally very happy with mutt, but one thing I wish it would do, > which apparently pine and several of the Mac mailers can do, is reply > to lists without my having to update my .muttrc to tell it about every > mailing list I might ever subscribe to.
pine doesn't have this function. even in more recent versions, which have support for rfc 2369 headers, you can't 'list-reply' or 'list-post'. you can, of course, group-reply, but you can do this in mutt too. > Is there a way to tell mutt to just reply to the address in the To > line (or, perhaps, in the To or Cc line) and not to the sender? how would mutt pick which? it's not psychic. > 99% of the time, that's what I want a list reply to do, and mutt's so > configurable that I figure there must be a way. I'd love to take all > those "lists" lines out of my .muttrc and have mutt "just work" for > all mailing lists. (I guessed "lists *" but it didn't work, L said > "No mailing lists found".) how is mutt supposed to know which addresses are mailing lists and which aren't? if mutt had support for interpreting rfc 2369 style headers, i suppose it would be possible to make a guess in some cases. note that you probably want to use 'subscribe' rather than 'lists' for lists that you're subscribed to. -- Will Yardley input: william < @ hq . newdream . net . >
