On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 06:33:10PM -0500, DaleKelly wrote:
> On 11/04/2014 12:37 PM, Joshua Smith wrote:
> >On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:31:26PM -0500, DaleKelly wrote:
> >>>On 11/04/2014 09:19 AM, Joshua Smith wrote:
> >>>> >mutt -v | grep -i smtp
> >>>
> >>>I get this
> >>>
> >>>mutt -v | grep -i smtp
> >>>Configure options: '--enable-pop' '--enable-smtp' '--with-sasl' 
> >>>'--with-ssl'
> >>>+USE_POP  -USE_IMAP  +USE_SMTP
> >Is that from the mutt you built by hand or the mutt from apt?  At this
> >point its not exactly clear what you've done with regards to installing
> >from the repo or building from source.
> >
> 
> the one from hand, I tried the repository but it didn't work and I removed
> it, and did my configure/make/make install of the source one over
> 

The repository version has been found to be suitable by
many, many different users.  No one has been able to get
your hand built version to work.

Please consider the likelyhood that your previous problems
with the repository version were due to your unfamiliarity
with mutt configuration.

Using the repository version would eliminate one large
source of uncertainty.


BTW just to be sure, when you say you add things like
  "set pop_host=pop://u...@pop.secureserver.net:110"
to your ~/.muttrc file, that is not literal is it?
I.e. it contains your actual pop server's URL and your
actual user name at that server, correct?

Jon
-- 
Jon H. LaBadie                 j...@jgcomp.com
 11226 South Shore Rd.          (703) 787-0688 (H)
 Reston, VA  20190              (609) 477-8330 (C)

Reply via email to