On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 9:18 AM, dumbiggie <[email protected]> wrote: > --- On Wed, 4/7/10, Eric Sharkey <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The analog broadcast contains only >> the standard definition version and only the primary channel for each of >> the stations. The digital subchannels aren't broadcast in analog. > > This standard practice irritates me greatly.
Why? It really is time for analog to die. That the cable companies are choosing to let it die slowly seems ok to me, but the idea that they should create new analog channels seems like a bad idea to me. > We can subscribe to various pay TV services (we're already on Dish Network) > but the lack of any subchannels is a problem. Why do you want them in analog format? Comcast provides all these channels in clear QAM. Clear QAM tuner cards are cheap (cheaper than what I paid for my PVR 150, anyway). > I plan to invest in some serious OTA reception equipment, No analog there anymore either. Eric ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Mvpmc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mvpmc-users mvpmc wiki: http://mvpmc.wikispaces.com/
