On 02/09/2010 4:35 p, [email protected] wrote:
Clustering is a general term, do you know which one you are comparing
with replication? Clustering most typically refers to high availability
clustering or high performance clustering, which wouldnt
necessarily/normally imply any copy of the actual data.
If you want a copy of your data on another server, replication is the
obvious choice. Assuming the realities of replication arent a problem
with respect to your requirements, ie replication is asynchronous...
Andy.
True.
Simply put: I want a solution that ensures that server 2 has all the
data at server 1 at any point in time; say server 1 suddenly fell into a
pond :) . I wouldnt want to open server 2 and find the last
insert/update/delete missing...
--
Jangita | +256 76 91 8383 | Y! & MSN: [email protected]
Skype: jangita | GTalk: [email protected]
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[email protected]
