On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Stephan Tesch <s.te...@science-computing.de> wrote: > Am 20.05.2010 11:32, schrieb Assaf Flatto: > > Hello Assaf, > >> One approach is to monitor a VIP for the service (i.e. the "clustered" >> ip of the external facing IP address of the routers) for finding if the >> service is up , and the individual devices by their direct IP for each >> device activity . >> >> This will give you both the business view ( if the VIP is down then the >> business is impacted) , and the operational view ( one device impacted ). >> > This is for sure a good idea. On the other hand this would mean that we > have to monitor another "host" and also plan for downtimes of this host, > too. An approach where I just define the redundant hosts and get the > report that I need would in my opinion be the better one. The data is > all there, it just has to be evaluated. I really can't believe, that I'm > the only one with this problem?
I'm not sure if there is an easy way to do just this for vanilla Nagios, but op5:s Ninja project includes SLA reports with this exact functionality: http://www.op5.org/community/projects/ninja Best regards, Martin Melin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null