On 05/20/2010 06:28 PM, Stephan Tesch wrote: > Am 20.05.2010 11:32, schrieb Assaf Flatto: > > Hello Assaf, > >> One approach is to monitor a VIP for the service (i.e. the "clustered" >> ip of the external facing IP address of the routers) for finding if the >> service is up , and the individual devices by their direct IP for each >> device activity . >> >> This will give you both the business view ( if the VIP is down then the >> business is impacted) , and the operational view ( one device impacted ). >> > This is for sure a good idea. On the other hand this would mean that we > have to monitor another "host" and also plan for downtimes of this host, > too. An approach where I just define the redundant hosts and get the > report that I need would in my opinion be the better one. The data is > all there, it just has to be evaluated. I really can't believe, that I'm > the only one with this problem? >
You're not. Ninja has cluster-mode capabilities in its reporting tool. Check it out if you're interested. Adding such a feature to the cgi's would be more hassle than it's worth, and I sure as hell won't get the time for it from work since we already have it in our own reporting solution. -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.erics...@op5.se OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war on peace. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null