There are ways to jot use a "credit card". I would just get a reloadable debit 
card and put $ on it when I need to get supplies. I just sent my son to college 
with one and we buy refill cards to put $ on his card.

Sent from Jennifer's iPhone

On Sep 15, 2010, at 7:59 AM, Rhonda Kibuk <[email protected]> wrote:

> Personally this sounds like a way to INCREASE credit card debt in America.  
> May this is an underhanded way to bail out the banks, yet once again.
>  
> R
> 
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Diana Bonn <[email protected]> wrote:
> I know this is boring to some, but you have to realize that this impacts the 
> way you file your taxes (write offs/deductions) next year for your nail biz.  
> So if you know what is going to happen, you can simply change your buying 
> habits to save you alot of grief and bull crap when you do your 2011 taxes,
> 
> As I stated before, this new tax requirement concerns our PURCHASES of 
> products, services goods for your business. If you purchase more than $600.00 
> per company, you have to file a 1099 form and give it to this company.  
> Example, you purchase all year long 600.00 worth of office supplies at 
> Staples, your receipts add up to 600.00, you have to contact staples, get 
> their Federal ID number, and GIVE THEM a 1099 form.
> 
> How you can avoid this new tax requirement is either pay by credit/debit 
> card.....you DO NOT have to file a 1099 form if you pay by credit/debit card.
> If you pay by cash/check you have to file the 1099 form.
> If you don't want to file a 1099 form and your receipts total up to 600.00 or 
> more, YOU CAN'T write it off as a deduction.
> 
> Anyway, below is a post I received about the Senate trying to block this.  It 
> failed.  A couple of Senators even tried to make the filing of 25 or more 
> employees and even up the 600.00 to 5,000.00 dollars. It didn't work.  This 
> is all part of the Obama Health Care package.
> 
> As I hear more I will let you know.  This all just happened and I can't find 
> anything in the news as of right now.  I don't know if this will be repealed 
> or not.  If the Fall elections change in the House and Senate, don't know if 
> this will get changed.
> 
> I just wanted you to realize that starting in January 2011 you may want to 
> take advantage of anything you pay with cash/check and expect to spend more 
> thatn $600.00 at one location, you may want to change to credit/debit card to 
> save you the headache of filing 1099 forms.  diana from indiana
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> By Alexander Bolton - 09/14/10 12:47 PM ET
> The Senate on Tuesday defeated an effort to strip a controversial 
> tax-reporting provision from the sweeping healthcare law Congress passed 
> earlier this year.
> 
>  In a 46-52 vote, lawmakers killed an amendment sponsored by Sen. Mike 
> Johanns (R-Neb.) that would have saved businesses and nonprofit groups from 
> having to report an array of small and medium-sized purchases to the Internal 
> Revenue Service.
> 
>  A handful of Democrats voted for the Johanns proposal, including Sens. Evan 
> Bayh (Ind.), Michael Bennet (Colo.), Blanche Lincoln (Ark.), Ben Nelson 
> (Neb.), Mark Pryor (Ark.), Mark Warner (Va.), and Jim Webb (Va.).
> 
>  The vote puts the Senate on track to pass small-business assistance 
> legislation this week or early next week.
> 
>  The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business groups had lobbied furiously 
> in favor of the Johanns amendment. Business groups argue the new requirements 
> impose a heavy cost on small businesses and will harm the economy.
> 
>  The provision, which is estimated to raise $17 billion over 10 years to pay 
> for a new prevention and public healthcare fund, requires businesses and 
> other groups to file 1099 tax forms to report purchases from a single 
> supplier that total more than $600 in a year.
> 
>  PLEASE NOTE:  That's a 1099 for each and every time a $600 purchase or 
> service is transacted.  It's going to add to the cost of whatever service or 
> product the purchaser does.
> 
>  An alternative to Johann's amendment sponsored by Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) 
> also fell short of passage. Nelson's proposal would have increased the 
> reporting threshold to $5,000 and eliminated the requirement for businesses 
> with fewer than 25 employees.
> 
> Nelson's amendment failed by a vote of 56 to 42, four votes short of the 60 
> needed to cut off debate and move to a final vote.
> 
> Republicans expressed concerns over the Nelson alternative because it would 
> have been paid for by repealing a tax break for large oil-and-gas producers.
> 
> Senate Republicans said they were not surprised the Johanns amendment did not 
> attract more votes, citing staunch opposition from President Obama.
> 
>  "The White House does not want to set the precedent of rewriting the 
> healthcare bill," said a GOP aide. "They don't want to admit they made any 
> mistakes in the bill before the election."
> 
>  Democratic leaders scheduled the vote on the Johanns amendment to secure the 
> support of Sen. George Voinovich (R-Ohio) to advance the small-business bill. 
> Voinovich had demanded consideration of the small-business reporting 
> provision before agreeing to a final vote on the broader bill.
> 
>  The legislation would provide $12 billion in tax cuts to small businesses 
> and set up a $30 billion Small Business Lending Fund. It would allow 
> businesses to write off up to $500,000 in capital investments and 50 percent 
> of the cost of new equipment. It would also increase to $10,000 the tax 
> deduction for small business start-ups.
> 
>  Julian Pecquet contributed to this story.
> 
> This story was posted at 11:59 a.m. and updated at 12:47 p.m.
> 
>  
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "NailTech" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "NailTech" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NailTech" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en.

Reply via email to