Another way around the cc issue......interesting diversion. 
 Marsha Rubino
Gimme Nails @ Skin Envy Day Spa
38 First Ave E. Ste. E
Kalispell, MT 59901
406-755-3771 




________________________________
From: Jennifer White <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wed, September 15, 2010 9:18:28 AM
Subject: Re: NailTech:: 1099 deduction form updates


There are ways to jot use a "credit card". I would just get a reloadable debit 
card and put $ on it when I need to get supplies. I just sent my son to college 
with one and we buy refill cards to put $ on his card.

Sent from Jennifer's iPhone

On Sep 15, 2010, at 7:59 AM, Rhonda Kibuk <[email protected]> wrote:


Personally this sounds like a way to INCREASE credit card debt in America.  May 
this is an underhanded way to bail out the banks, yet once again.
>
>R
>
>
>On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Diana Bonn <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>I know this is boring to some, but you have to realize that this impacts the 
>way 
>you file your taxes (write offs/deductions) next year for your nail biz.  So 
>if 
>you know what is going to happen, you can simply change your buying habits to 
>save you alot of grief and bull crap when you do your 2011 taxes,
>>
>>As I stated before, this new tax requirement concerns our PURCHASES of 
>>products, 
>>services goods for your business. If you purchase more than $600.00 per 
>>company, 
>>you have to file a 1099 form and give it to this company.  Example, you 
>>purchase 
>>all year long 600.00 worth of office supplies at Staples, your receipts add 
>>up 
>>to 600.00, you have to contact staples, get their Federal ID number, and GIVE 
>>THEM a 1099 form.
>>
>>How you can avoid this new tax requirement is either pay by credit/debit 
>>card.....you DO NOT have to file a 1099 form if you pay by credit/debit card.
>>If you pay by cash/check you have to file the 1099 form.
>>If you don't want to file a 1099 form and your receipts total up to 600.00 or 
>>more, YOU CAN'T write it off as a deduction.
>>
>>Anyway, below is a post I received about the Senate trying to block this.  It 
>>failed.  A couple of Senators even tried to make the filing of 25 or more 
>>employees and even up the 600.00 to 5,000.00 dollars. It didn't work.  This 
>>is 
>>all part of the Obama Health Care package.
>>
>>As I hear more I will let you know.  This all just happened and I can't find 
>>anything in the news as of right now.  I don't know if this will be repealed 
>>or 
>>not.  If the Fall elections change in the House and Senate, don't know if 
>>this 
>>will get changed.
>>
>>I just wanted you to realize that starting in January 2011 you may want to 
>>take 
>>advantage of anything you pay with cash/check and expect to spend more thatn 
>>$600.00 at one location, you may want to change to credit/debit card to save 
>>you 
>>the headache of filing 1099 forms.  diana from indiana
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>By Alexander Bolton - 09/14/10 12:47 PM ET
>>The Senate on Tuesday defeated an effort to strip a controversial 
>>tax-reporting 
>>provision from the sweeping healthcare law Congress passed earlier this year.
>>
>> In a 46-52 vote, lawmakers killed an amendment sponsored by Sen. Mike 
>>Johanns 
>>(R-Neb.) that would have saved businesses and nonprofit groups from having to 
>>report an array of small and medium-sized purchases to the Internal Revenue 
>>Service.
>>
>> A handful of Democrats voted for the Johanns proposal, including Sens. Evan 
>>Bayh (Ind.), Michael Bennet (Colo.), Blanche Lincoln (Ark.), Ben Nelson 
>>(Neb.), 
>>Mark Pryor (Ark.), Mark Warner (Va.), and Jim Webb (Va.).
>>
>> The vote puts the Senate on track to pass small-business assistance 
>>legislation 
>>this week or early next week.
>>
>> The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business groups had lobbied furiously 
>>in 
>>favor of the Johanns amendment. Business groups argue the new requirements 
>>impose a heavy cost on small businesses and will harm the economy.
>>
>> The provision, which is estimated to raise $17 billion over 10 years to pay 
>>for 
>>a new prevention and public healthcare fund, requires businesses and other 
>>groups to file 1099 tax forms to report purchases from a single supplier that 
>>total more than $600 in a year.
>>
>> PLEASE NOTE:  That's a 1099 for each and every time a $600 purchase or 
>>service 
>>is transacted.  It's going to add to the cost of whatever service or product 
>>the 
>>purchaser does.
>>
>> An alternative to Johann's amendment sponsored by Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) 
>>also fell short of passage. Nelson's proposal would have increased the 
>>reporting 
>>threshold to $5,000 and eliminated the requirement for businesses with fewer 
>>than 25 employees.
>>
>>Nelson's amendment failed by a vote of 56 to 42, four votes short of the 60 
>>needed to cut off debate and move to a final vote.
>>
>>Republicans expressed concerns over the Nelson alternative because it would 
>>have 
>>been paid for by repealing a tax break for large oil-and-gas producers.
>>
>>Senate Republicans said they were not surprised the Johanns amendment did not 
>>attract more votes, citing staunch opposition from President Obama.
>>
>> "The White House does not want to set the precedent of rewriting the 
>>healthcare 
>>bill," said a GOP aide. "They don't want to admit they made any mistakes in 
>>the 
>>bill before the election."
>>
>> Democratic leaders scheduled the vote on the Johanns amendment to secure the 
>>support of Sen. George Voinovich (R-Ohio) to advance the small-business bill. 
>>Voinovich had demanded consideration of the small-business reporting 
>>provision 
>>before agreeing to a final vote on the broader bill.
>>
>> The legislation would provide $12 billion in tax cuts to small businesses 
>>and 
>>set up a $30 billion Small Business Lending Fund. It would allow businesses 
>>to 
>>write off up to $500,000 in capital investments and 50 percent of the cost of 
>>new equipment. It would also increase to $10,000 the tax deduction for small 
>>business start-ups.
>>
>> Julian Pecquet contributed to this story.
>>
>>This story was posted at 11:59 a.m. and updated at 12:47 p.m.
>>
>> 
>>-- 
>>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>"NailTech" group.
>>To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>[email protected].
>>For more options, visit this group at 
>>http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en.
>>
>>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>"NailTech" group.
>To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>[email protected].
>For more options, visit this group at 
>http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en.
>-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NailTech" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NailTech" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en.

Reply via email to