> -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Hannigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 10:51 AM > To: Alex Pilosov > Cc: nanog-futures@nanog.org > Subject: Re: [Nanog-futures] Cisco outage > > On Nov 28, 2007 1:33 PM, Alex Pilosov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Martin Hannigan wrote: > > > > > > To clarify this discussion, I'd like to point out that the bounce > in > > > > quesiton was from a private email from Marty to J.Oquendo. > > > > > > In response to a post from the list. Same exact thing we have setup > with > > > this autoresponder policy. > > Please don't confuzzle things. Was it an email *to* the list or was > it > > private email to J.Oquendo? > > Is his mail bouncing or not? You seem to like to apply standards to > things based on how you want to react. So far, I've been reading > Dillon, Bush, Oquendo, whine about being asked to be on topic. We've > had agreement on Bush's bad behavoir here before, Dillons as well, not > Oquendo, but he over-reacted based on a message that he did not see > which he didn't know about -- since he didn't see it. To date, nobody > has been warned. :-) It's amazing that challenging someones validity > causes such a ruckus. >
Mail from the list to the list subscriber is not bouncing. Thus, no violation of the AUP. > > > > It doesn't matter what it was in response *to*. Private email between > list > > members is not covered by AUP. In case this still isn't clear, if I > send a > > private email response to someone in response to their list post that > > contains off-topic information, that's not the AUP violation. To > insist > > that any email between list members need to comply to AUP is silly. > > Um. That's what happens when someone elses mailer responds to yours > and mail doesn't route through Merit's mailer. It's conversation > between your assets and mine. If Merit were somehow involved, you > might be right. > > To the list, as a result of a list post, etc. They work exactly the > same as far as I can tell. > Mail from the list to the list subscriber is not bouncing. Thus, no violation of the AUP. I do not wish to see action taken against J Oquendo related to mail bouncing between you and him. Regards, Mike
PGP.sig
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
