> And the MLC didn't bother responding to either (until this). And > probably won't respond further. Of course, my colleagues can say what > they want, but I don't see any reason why someone can't ask for clue > help. If that's the case then might I sugggest changing the pages that discuss what is, and what is not, apropriate for the mailing list? Those questions were not relevant to large network operators but if that is no longer the target of NANOG, then so be it.
This was two separate posts on two different days. Will the MLC still feel the same way if NANOG starts to get a dozen posts a day asking basic network questions that are more easily answered with a google search? I've gotten private emails from a number people who don't want to see NANOG become a technical support list- there are better resources for that. If, however, that's not how the MLC feels (which clearly seems to be true) then I'll go my merry way and apologize for wasting your time. -Don _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
