On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Martin Hannigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Joe Abley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 28 Apr 2008, at 17:58, Christopher Morrow wrote: > > > > > and telia I think also has v6 dualstack available, 701 does in some > > > 'major markets' ... NYC being one I believe, Jason Schiller could > > > comment on the correctness of this point. > > > > My experience with 701 is that v6 is definitively available for the > > purposes of responding to RFPs, but in practice when it comes to > > implementation it's difficult to find the person who knows what it is, > > or how to make it go. >
yea, that's an unfortunate situation for 701 :( I fear their sales folk and are missing some potential oportunities. If someone does need assistance with this I have 1 name I'd toss their way who was pretty on top of the v6 deployment (from a sales-eng perspective), Mr Cinque... proper POC info available privately. > Same for multicast, fwiw. > yea.. UUcast, the network that got parted out for a v6 network :) (among other things...) Probably the same person as I'd aim at for v6 I'd use for mcast... -Chris > > -M< > _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
