On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 09:43:22PM -0700, Paul Ferguson wrote: > But I have to say (again, apologies) that security issues on the Internet > - -- and especially the lack of engagement from ISPs -- is a major, major > problem that NANOG could be a major facilitator, instead of turning its > back on the woeful state of security affairs.
I strongly concur with this. > In any event, I think security-related issues are much more "on topic" than > ARIN IPv4 policy foo. I think I mildly disagree with this. The allocation of chunks of IPv4 space to dedicated abusers, and the hijacking of chunks of IPv4 space by abusers, are security-related issues. So if you mean "ARIN IPv4 policy" in the sense of "what their policies and procedures are", then I agree with you; if you mean it in the sense of "what the real-world consequences are", then I'm not so sure. ---Rsk _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
