On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 05:46:50AM -0400, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 09:43:22PM -0700, Paul Ferguson wrote:
[snip]
> > In any event, I think security-related issues are much more "on topic" than
> > ARIN IPv4 policy foo.
>
> I think I mildly disagree with this. The allocation of chunks of IPv4 space
> to dedicated abusers, and the hijacking of chunks of IPv4 space by abusers,
> are security-related issues. So if you mean "ARIN IPv4 policy" in the
> sense of "what their policies and procedures are", then I agree with you;
> if you mean it in the sense of "what the real-world consequences are",
> then I'm not so sure.
Same here. Our ongoing "problem" (if one would call it that) is being a
successful, large-tent organization.
--
RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
_______________________________________________
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
