On 2010-06-09, at 07:08, Sean Figgins wrote: > I would think that there may also me less apprehension if as part of > incorporating, THIS SC was disbanded, and a new election was held for > the new board of directors. We certainly should reward all the hard > work that it takes make this happen, but anything that THIS SC does, > should not mean automatic entitlement to some type of corporate royal > status.
If the replacement schedule for board members of NANOG, Inc. matched the existing replacement schedule for the SC, I don't see why any extraordinary measures would be called for. We're assuming that the NANOG, Inc. board has the same members as the SC, of course, which I don't remember hearing in any public context. Joe _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures@nanog.org https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
