I think using the same policies and the same election procedures is the right thing to do.
- Dan On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Joe Abley <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2010-06-09, at 07:08, Sean Figgins wrote: > > > I would think that there may also me less apprehension if as part of > > incorporating, THIS SC was disbanded, and a new election was held for > > the new board of directors. We certainly should reward all the hard > > work that it takes make this happen, but anything that THIS SC does, > > should not mean automatic entitlement to some type of corporate royal > > status. > > If the replacement schedule for board members of NANOG, Inc. matched the > existing replacement schedule for the SC, I don't see why any extraordinary > measures would be called for. > > We're assuming that the NANOG, Inc. board has the same members as the SC, > of course, which I don't remember hearing in any public context. > > > Joe > _______________________________________________ > Nanog-futures mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures >
_______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
