On Jun 9, 2010, at 4:57 AM, Joe Abley wrote: > > On 2010-06-09, at 07:08, Sean Figgins wrote: > >> I would think that there may also me less apprehension if as part of >> incorporating, THIS SC was disbanded, and a new election was held for >> the new board of directors. We certainly should reward all the hard >> work that it takes make this happen, but anything that THIS SC does, >> should not mean automatic entitlement to some type of corporate royal >> status. > > If the replacement schedule for board members of NANOG, Inc. matched the > existing replacement schedule for the SC, I don't see why any extraordinary > measures would be called for. > > We're assuming that the NANOG, Inc. board has the same members as the SC, of > course, which I don't remember hearing in any public context.
This along with some other information pertaining to the incorporation was silently posted to newnog.org. Kris _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
