On Oct 2, 2010, at 8:31 PM, Daniel Golding wrote: > Or maybe someone from the steering committee can step up and comment. That > would be refreshing.
I'll bite, but I think Steve Gibbard already said most of what I'd say. The membership working group was asked to come up with a membership plan, and that work has been done. We are now at the point where its time to vote on it. I think the discussion here is healthy and I very much appreciate it. If the to-be-voted-upon membership language is not appropriate for us going forward, it won't be the end of the world if we have to change it. If the proposal is voted down, it won't be the end of the world either. Regardless what happens next I'd like to thank those that worked on it for taking the time and sticking their necks out. DW _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
