> If the to-be-voted-upon membership language is not appropriate for
> us going forward, it won't be the end of the world if we have to
> change it.
> 
> If the proposal is voted down, it won't be the end of the world either.

perhaps the bylaws should have been segmented for voting?

randy

_______________________________________________
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures

Reply via email to