On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 23:26, Scott Hernandez wrote:
> I'd vote +1 on using filterchains and -1 on filtersets. It seems like with
> the right combination of standard filterchains we can replace the
> functionality of filtersets all together.
> 

I totally agree, I only ported the Ant filterset to Ant because I knew
Mitch was planning on submitting a replace task to NAnt that would not
use such a mechanism and would not initially support filesets

I have no problem removing it again, but we should somehow think about
how we'll be implementing fitlerchain support in NAnt.  Perhaps Stefan
Bodewig can give us some insights on how it was implemented in Ant (post
1.5)  and what the motives were for choosing that implementation ... I
haven't had time to check the Ant implementation yet ... Could be a
start for more cooperation between the Ant and NAnt developers, who
knows ...

Gert

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 11:19 AM
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] filterchains/sets other was: [Fwd: Ready to tackle
> next release]
> 
> 
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > I think I need to read up on filterchains a bit more. Is the
> > > functionality of  filterchains a superset of filtersets ?
> >
> > Yes, filtersets are in fact very limited as they only support token
> > replacement.
> >
> > >
> > > It should be possible to use the same type discovery mechanism we now
> > > use for Tasks and referencable elements to discover filterreader classes
> > > in a given assembly. Or somthing similar using attributes.
> >
> > Yes, the discovery mechanism shouldn't be all that hard.
> >
> > Should I comment out the filterset code in the <copy> and <move> tasks to
> > prevent users from using these until we've decided if we'll replace it by
> > filterchain support (shortly) ?
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> nant-developers mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
> 
> 



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

Reply via email to