Hello, > I agree, these problems should be resolved before we > introduce this feature. > > > I'm tempted to include it and let people have a play with > it and then > > refine it as necessary rather than holding out until its > perfect. What > > do people think ?
I'm not convinced to either. Resolve those issues completely could be pretty diffucult, but 95% use cases will be trivial case without basedirs and include/exclude conflict. IMHO atleast overall strategy should be discussed before introducing this feature to the core. > I'd rather have a more general approach, where all global > types implement > support for merging two distinct instances. I dont think I catch it. How could have general type "merge" operator? > Also, I'm not sure if this is something we should introduce > this late in the > game. > > We should try to get 0.85 out asap ... I've been too busy > lately, but I hope > to find a few hours next week ... > I definitely don't mean to sound disrespectful here. I appreciate the work > Martin has been doing here ! Agreed it should go after 0.85. No new features after RC is out is good strategy, I think. Martin ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
