On 2011-10-26, Ryan Boggs wrote: > Now that 0.91 final is out the door, I would like to start discussing > what items to work on in both NAnt/NAntContrib. Attached is an html > file of an outline I put together with thoughts about next steps I > have had for months (I put it in an attachment just in case your email > viewers don't handle html emails).
Jumping in at some random point and as somebody who has a strong Ant background but doesn't really know NAnt as good as I should. I can't say much about your choice of SCM. Why do you feel Sourceforge's git offering was insufficient - this is an honest question as I may be thinking about moving XMLUnit to a different SCM myself (currently using svn at Sourceforge). We'll be polling log4net's users about platform support soon. I also feel you are safe to require 2.0 at runtime as long as you keep 1.x as targets. When I worked on the log4net release I cursed NAnt's lack of a <mapper> so a big +1 for this. I also miss <macrodef>. Badly. Have you seen the 1.2.11 release of log4net of about two weeks ago? ;-) Stefan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly. Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities. http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
