Hi, On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Rob Richardson <erobr...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I'll avoid the >athon and just reply at the top. > > +1 on git and github. That's more-or-less the lingua franca of > open-source now-a-days. Being able to accept pull > requests would be awesome! Once it's > there, I've got a heap ton of pull requests I'd love to hand off. To that > end, we should consider a <git> > task in NAnt, and consider moving <cvs> to NAntContrib. Nice, another plus 1. My thinking was to move both NAnt/NAntContrib to a non-CVS repo at the same time. Hopefully, this process will bring the projects closer together in scope so we don't have a lag on one side or another. > > I'd like to see <nunit2> > either get to 2.5.10 or spun off as a separate project. I had to resort to > <exec> to get 2.5.10 > working as well. Many SF patches / posts > have upgraded the task throughout the years, but it's never gotten pulled > into the trunk. If NAnt's cadence is going to be anywhere > near previous precedent, <nunit2> has to move separately to remain relevant. My goal is to get it to the latest version, which is 2.5.10 I believe. Like I stated in a previous email today, I couldn't get to it during 0.91 development because of the amount of effort needed to update NAnt to use the new NUnit API. > > I'd like to also throw in my > vote to get <msbuild> moved from NAntContrib to NAnt. The <solution> task > hasn't worked for > me in 5 years, and thus <msbuild> has really become an essential part of > NAnt. (Towards the goals of NAnt 2.5, we could shim <solution> to use > <msbuild> for VS 2005+ projects/solutions.) Tangentially related, if we used > the > <msbuild> task to build NAnt, we could easily get "Any CPU" > mode -- a result not currently available in the NAnt release package. IIRC, the <msbuild> task needs some more effort before being ported over. I know there was work done around VS.NET/msbuild during the 0.91 release cycle but I am not sure how much of that effort related to the NAntContrib <msbuild> task.
I was planning on approaching this now anyway. One of the things I would like to work on is some kind of sandcastle task for doc building but it would probably have to rely on that <msbuild> task. > > +1 on moving to .net 2 and > generics, and a standard #define net_4 release would also be awesome. I thought we had the net_4.0 preprocessing tag in NAnt already, unless I am misunderstanding you here. > > How can I help? Love the enthusiasm! :) Speak up and be heard. I try to read these messages as much as I can so any input/advice/suggestions you or anyone else may have, please chime in. We welcome it. :) I'm hoping to get a more up-to-date contribution guide going once we make a decision on the cvs repo situation. I'll post it once we get there. :) Thanks, Ryan > > Rob > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the > demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly. > Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn > about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > nant-developers mailing list > nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly. Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities. http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
