On 2011-10-26, Ryan Boggs wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Stefan Bodewig > <stefan.bode...@freenet.de> wrote:
>> Why do you feel Sourceforge's git offering was insufficient - this is >> an honest question as I may be thinking about moving XMLUnit to a >> different SCM myself (currently using svn at Sourceforge). > It just doesn't feel like there is alot of effort on the repo side in > terms of code reviews and other tools that sites like github have. Understood, thanks. >> When I worked on the log4net release I cursed NAnt's lack of a <mapper> >> so a big +1 for this. I also miss <macrodef>. Badly. > I should add <macrodef> too, eh? This may be my Ant bias. log4net's build file is a big mess of copy-paste and I think macrodef would help, but maybe there is a NAnt-idiomatic way of fixing that without macrodef. It looks as if "call"ing a target is something you'd do more lightly and more often in NAnt than in Ant. > It took me awhile to get NAnt to use log4net 1.2.10 because of > sharpcvslib's dependency on log4net 1.2.9. Since I was recently > granted commit access to that project, I could see if I could upgrade > the dependency in both projects. Binding redirects? I don't think we've made API changes that would cause trouble otherwise. Of course, if you can change the dependency then switching to 1.2.11 - and to the "new" strong name key - would probably be better. Stefan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly. Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities. http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
