nashorn-dev  

Messages by Date

• 2016/03/22 Re: Review request for JDK-8151810: for-in iteration does not provide per-iteration scope Marcus Lagergren
• 2016/03/22 Re: Review request for JDK-8151811: Const declarations do not work in for..in loops Marcus Lagergren
• 2016/03/21 Re: Proper ClassLoader with ClassShutter Tony Zakula
• 2016/03/21 Re: Proper ClassLoader with ClassShutter Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/03/21 Re: Review request for JDK-8151809: ES6 Map/Set insertion with existing keys changes iteration order Attila Szegedi
• 2016/03/21 Re: Review request for JDK-8151700: Add support for ES6 for-of Attila Szegedi
• 2016/03/21 Re: Review request for JDK-8151811: Const declarations do not work in for..in loops Attila Szegedi
• 2016/03/21 Re: Review request for JDK-8151810: for-in iteration does not provide per-iteration scope Attila Szegedi
• 2016/03/21 Re: Review request for JDK-8147613 Michael Haupt
• 2016/03/21 Re: Review request for JDK-8151809: ES6 Map/Set insertion with existing keys changes iteration order Michael Haupt
• 2016/03/21 Review request for JDK-8151700: Add support for ES6 for-of Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/03/21 Review request for JDK-8151811: Const declarations do not work in for..in loops Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/03/21 Review request for JDK-8151810: for-in iteration does not provide per-iteration scope Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/03/20 Proper ClassLoader with ClassShutter Tony Zakula
• 2016/03/20 Re: Review request for JDK-8147613 Marcus Lagergren
• 2016/03/19 Review request for JDK-8147613 Srinivas Dama
• 2016/03/16 Re: Nashorn increase in eval duration over time Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/03/15 Re: Review request for JDK-8151809: ES6 Map/Set insertion with existing keys changes iteration order Marcus Lagergren
• 2016/03/14 Re: Nashorn increase in eval duration over time Jan Bauer Nielsen
• 2016/03/14 Re: Nashorn increase in eval duration over time Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/03/14 Review request for JDK-8151809: ES6 Map/Set insertion with existing keys changes iteration order Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/03/14 Re: RFR 8150731: Nashorn JSObject linker should be exposed as a service provider Marcus Lagergren
• 2016/03/13 Re: Linking to prototypes and loadWithNewGlobal Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/03/12 Nashorn increase in eval duration over time Jan Bauer Nielsen
• 2016/03/11 Linking to prototypes and loadWithNewGlobal Eric Pederson
• 2016/03/11 Re: Review request for JDK-8138906 Michael Haupt
• 2016/03/11 Review request for JDK-8138906 Srinivas Dama
• 2016/03/10 Re: RFR 8150731: Nashorn JSObject linker should be exposed as a service provider Attila Szegedi
• 2016/03/10 Re: RFR 8150731: Nashorn JSObject linker should be exposed as a service provider Michael Haupt
• 2016/03/10 RFR 8150731: Nashorn JSObject linker should be exposed as a service provider Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/03/09 Re: Review request for JDK-8151515: $EXEC output is truncated Jim Laskey (Oracle)
• 2016/03/09 Re: Review request for JDK-8151515: $EXEC output is truncated Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/03/09 Review request for JDK-8151515: $EXEC output is truncated Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/03/09 Re: RFR(XS): 8151518: relax test requirements to reduce dependency on directory contents Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/03/09 Re: RFR(XS): 8151518: relax test requirements to reduce dependency on directory contents Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/03/09 RFR(XS): 8151518: relax test requirements to reduce dependency on directory contents Michael Haupt
• 2016/03/09 Re: RFR(S): 8151291: $EXEC yields "unknown command" on Cygwin Michael Haupt
• 2016/03/09 Re: RFR(S): 8151291: $EXEC yields "unknown command" on Cygwin Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/03/09 Re: RFR(S): 8151291: $EXEC yields "unknown command" on Cygwin Jim Laskey (Oracle)
• 2016/03/09 Re: RFR(S): 8151291: $EXEC yields "unknown command" on Cygwin Michael Haupt
• 2016/03/08 Re: RFR(S): 8151291: $EXEC yields "unknown command" on Cygwin Michael Haupt
• 2016/03/08 Re: RFR(S): 8151291: $EXEC yields "unknown command" on Cygwin Michael Haupt
• 2016/03/07 RE: RFR(S): 8151291: $EXEC yields "unknown command" on Cygwin Srinivas Dama
• 2016/03/07 Re: RFR(S): 8151291: $EXEC yields "unknown command" on Cygwin Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/03/07 Re: RFR(S): 8151291: $EXEC yields "unknown command" on Cygwin Michael Haupt
• 2016/03/07 Re: RFR(S): 8151291: $EXEC yields "unknown command" on Cygwin Jim Laskey (Oracle)
• 2016/03/07 RFR(S): 8151291: $EXEC yields "unknown command" on Cygwin Michael Haupt
• 2016/03/07 Re: Review request for JDK-8148148: Remove pluggable CodeStore API Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/03/07 Re: Review request for JDK-8148148: Remove pluggable CodeStore API Michael Haupt
• 2016/03/07 Re: Review request for JDK-8148148: Remove pluggable CodeStore API Attila Szegedi
• 2016/03/07 Review request for JDK-8148148: Remove pluggable CodeStore API Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/03/02 Re: Review request for JDK-8138906 Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/03/01 RE: Review request for JDK-8138906 Srinivas Dama
• 2016/03/01 Re: Review request for JDK-8138906 Michael Haupt
• 2016/02/29 Re: How to prevent built-in functions or objects to be overwritten? Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/02/29 How to prevent built-in functions or objects to be overwritten? Trig Chen
• 2016/02/29 Review request for JDK-8138906 Srinivas Dama
• 2016/02/29 Re: Review request for JDK-8150218: Autoconversion SAM adapters sometimes don't get privileges Attila Szegedi
• 2016/02/29 Re: RFR(XXS): 8150814: correct package declaration in Nashorn test Attila Szegedi
• 2016/02/29 Re: Review request for JDK-8150218: Autoconversion SAM adapters sometimes don't get privileges Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/02/29 Re: RFR(XXS): 8150814: correct package declaration in Nashorn test Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/02/29 Re: Review request for JDK-8150218: Autoconversion SAM adapters sometimes don't get privileges Michael Haupt
• 2016/02/29 RFR(XXS): 8150814: correct package declaration in Nashorn test Michael Haupt
• 2016/02/29 Re: RFR(S): 8148140: arguments are handled differently in apply for JS functions and AbstractJSObjects Michael Haupt
• 2016/02/27 Review request for JDK-8150218: Autoconversion SAM adapters sometimes don't get privileges Attila Szegedi
• 2016/02/27 Re: RFR(S): 8148140: arguments are handled differently in apply for JS functions and AbstractJSObjects Attila Szegedi
• 2016/02/27 Re: [8u] approval request for 8148379: jdk.nashorn.api.scripting spec. adjustments, clarifications Attila Szegedi
• 2016/02/25 Re: [8u] approval request for 8148379: jdk.nashorn.api.scripting spec. adjustments, clarifications Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/02/25 Re: [8u] approval request for 8148379: jdk.nashorn.api.scripting spec. adjustments, clarifications Seán Coffey
• 2016/02/25 Re: nashorn Java8u45 Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/02/25 nashorn Java8u45 Houtman, Roland
• 2016/02/25 Re: [8u] approval request for 8148379: jdk.nashorn.api.scripting spec. adjustments, clarifications Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/02/24 Re: RFR 8148379: jdk.nashorn.api.scripting spec. adjustments, clarifications Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/02/24 Re: RFR 8148379: jdk.nashorn.api.scripting spec. adjustments, clarifications Michael Haupt
• 2016/02/24 RFR 8148379: jdk.nashorn.api.scripting spec. adjustments, clarifications Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/02/24 How to improve nashorn memory footprint with large amount of compiled scripts? Houtman, Roland
• 2016/02/23 Re: time limit for compiled script Attila Szegedi
• 2016/02/23 Re: time limit for compiled script Remi Forax
• 2016/02/23 nashorn memory footprint with large amount of compiled scripts r houtman
• 2016/02/22 Re: time limit for compiled script Attila Szegedi
• 2016/02/22 time limit for compiled script Tomáš Zíma
• 2016/02/16 Re: RFR(S): 8148140: arguments are handled differently in apply for JS functions and AbstractJSObjects Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/02/16 Re: RFR(S): 8148140: arguments are handled differently in apply for JS functions and AbstractJSObjects Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/02/16 RFR(S): 8148140: arguments are handled differently in apply for JS functions and AbstractJSObjects Michael Haupt
• 2016/02/15 Re: Review request for JDK-8147558: Add support for ES6 collections Michael Haupt
• 2016/02/15 Re: Review request for JDK-8149451: Fix bytecode generation issue after 8149186 Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/02/15 Re: Review request for JDK-8149451: Fix bytecode generation issue after 8149186 Michael Haupt
• 2016/02/15 Re: [8u] approval request for 8149744: fix testng.jar delivery in Nashorn build.xml Rob McKenna
• 2016/02/15 Re: [8u] approval request for 8149744: fix testng.jar delivery in Nashorn build.xml Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/02/15 [8u] approval request for 8149744: fix testng.jar delivery in Nashorn build.xml Michael Haupt
• 2016/02/12 Re: RFR(S): 8149744: fix testng.jar delivery in Nashorn build.xml Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/02/12 Re: RFR(S): 8149744: fix testng.jar delivery in Nashorn build.xml Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/02/12 RFR(S): 8149744: fix testng.jar delivery in Nashorn build.xml Michael Haupt
• 2016/02/12 Re: Review request for JDK-8149451: Fix bytecode generation issue after 8149186 Michael Haupt
• 2016/02/12 Re: Review request for JDK-8147558: Add support for ES6 collections Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/02/11 Re: RFR - JDK-8141209 $EXEC should allow streaming of output Attila Szegedi
• 2016/02/11 Re: Review request for JDK-8149451: Fix bytecode generation issue after 8149186 Attila Szegedi
• 2016/02/11 Re: bug-report-can-t-call-static-methods-on-a-java-class-instance Attila Szegedi
• 2016/02/11 Re: Review request for JDK-8149451: Fix bytecode generation issue after 8149186 Michael Haupt
• 2016/02/11 Re: Review request for JDK-8149451: Fix bytecode generation issue after 8149186 Jim Laskey (Oracle)
• 2016/02/11 Review request for JDK-8149451: Fix bytecode generation issue after 8149186 Attila Szegedi
• 2016/02/11 Re: bug-report-can-t-call-static-methods-on-a-java-class-instance Christoph Sauer
• 2016/02/10 Re: RFR - JDK-8141209 $EXEC should allow streaming of output Michael Haupt
• 2016/02/09 RFR - JDK-8141209 $EXEC should allow streaming of output Jim Laskey (Oracle)
• 2016/02/09 Re: RFR(S): 8149462: revert changes for 8149186 Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/02/09 Re: RFR(S): 8149462: revert changes for 8149186 Jim Laskey (Oracle)
• 2016/02/09 RFR(S): 8149462: revert changes for 8149186 Michael Haupt
• 2016/02/08 Re: RFR(S): 8149334: JSON.parse(JSON.stringify([])).push(10) creates an array containing two elements Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/02/08 Re: RFR(S): 8149334: JSON.parse(JSON.stringify([])).push(10) creates an array containing two elements Jim Laskey (Oracle)
• 2016/02/08 RFR(S): 8149334: JSON.parse(JSON.stringify([])).push(10) creates an array containing two elements Michael Haupt
• 2016/02/07 Re: Review request for JDK-8149186: Don't use indy for optimistic arithmetic Michael Haupt
• 2016/02/07 Re: Review request for JDK-8149186: Don't use indy for optimistic arithmetic Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/02/07 Review request for JDK-8149186: Don't use indy for optimistic arithmetic Attila Szegedi
• 2016/02/05 Re: Review request for JDK-8147558: Add support for ES6 collections Attila Szegedi
• 2016/02/05 Re: Review request for JDK-8147558: Add support for ES6 collections Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/02/05 Re: Review request for JDK-8147558: Add support for ES6 collections Attila Szegedi
• 2016/02/05 Review request for JDK-8147558: Add support for ES6 collections Hannes Wallnöfer
• 2016/02/04 Re: bug-report-can-t-call-static-methods-on-a-java-class-instance Attila Szegedi
• 2016/02/04 Re: Review request for backport of JDK-8146274: Thread spinning on WeakHashMap.getEntry() with concurrent use of nashorn Marcus Lagergren
• 2016/02/04 Re: RFR 8148926: Call site profiling fails on braces-wrapped anonymous function Marcus Lagergren
• 2016/02/04 Re: Review request for backport of JDK-8144020: Remove long as an internal numeric type Marcus Lagergren
• 2016/02/04 Re: RFR 8148926: Call site profiling fails on braces-wrapped anonymous function Jim Laskey (Oracle)
• 2016/02/04 Re: RFR 8148926: Call site profiling fails on braces-wrapped anonymous function Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/02/04 bug-report-can-t-call-static-methods-on-a-java-class-instance Christoph Sauer
• 2016/02/04 RFR 8148926: Call site profiling fails on braces-wrapped anonymous function Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/02/01 Re: Getting the AST ? Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/02/01 Problem with myIpAddress() in PAC-file environment Hakan Carlsson
• 2016/02/01 Re: Getting the AST ? Geir Magnusson Jr.
• 2016/02/01 Re: meatspace memory OOME using Nashorn and Callable Riccardo Maggi
• 2016/01/31 Re: Getting the AST ? Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/01/31 Re: Getting the AST ? Attila Szegedi
• 2016/01/30 Getting the AST ? Geir Magnusson Jr.
• 2016/01/29 Re: RFR 8148617: top level make docs target does not generate javadocs for dynalink API Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/01/29 Re: RFR 8148617: top level make docs target does not generate javadocs for dynalink API Erik Joelsson
• 2016/01/29 Re: RFR 8148617: top level make docs target does not generate javadocs for dynalink API Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/01/29 Re: RFR 8148617: top level make docs target does not generate javadocs for dynalink API Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/01/29 Re: RFR 8148617: top level make docs target does not generate javadocs for dynalink API Erik Joelsson
• 2016/01/29 RFR 8148617: top level make docs target does not generate javadocs for dynalink API Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/01/29 Re: callback every x instruction Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/01/28 callback every x instruction walid
• 2016/01/28 Re: RFR(M): 8147591: Revisit Collection.toArray(new T[size]) calls in nashorn and dynalink code Aleksey Shipilev
• 2016/01/28 Re: RFR(M): 8147591: Revisit Collection.toArray(new T[size]) calls in nashorn and dynalink code Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/01/28 Re: RFR(M): 8147591: Revisit Collection.toArray(new T[size]) calls in nashorn and dynalink code Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/01/28 RFR(M): 8147591: Revisit Collection.toArray(new T[size]) calls in nashorn and dynalink code Michael Haupt
• 2016/01/28 Re: Review request for backport of JDK-8146274: Thread spinning on WeakHashMap.getEntry() with concurrent use of nashorn Michael Haupt
• 2016/01/27 Re: Review request for backport of JDK-8146274: Thread spinning on WeakHashMap.getEntry() with concurrent use of nashorn Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/01/27 Review request for backport of JDK-8146274: Thread spinning on WeakHashMap.getEntry() with concurrent use of nashorn Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/01/27 Re: meatspace memory OOME using Nashorn and Callable Benjamin Sieffert
• 2016/01/26 meatspace memory OOME using Nashorn and Callable Riccardo Maggi
• 2016/01/26 Re: Review request for JDK-8148214 : Slow object allocation due to multiple synchronization Michael Haupt
• 2016/01/26 Re: Review request for JDK-8148214 : Slow object allocation due to multiple synchronization Attila Szegedi
• 2016/01/26 Review request for JDK-8148214 : Slow object allocation due to multiple synchronization Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/01/26 Re: wrt: "A new execution model for Nashorn in Java 9" Marcus Lagergren
• 2016/01/22 Re: Review request for JDK-8148040 : jjs -fx test does not exit Michael Haupt
• 2016/01/22 Re: Review request for backport of JDK-8144020: Remove long as an internal numeric type Attila Szegedi
• 2016/01/22 Review request for JDK-8148040 : jjs -fx test does not exit Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/01/22 Re: RFR(XXS): 8134933: re-enable LambdaFormEditor assertions in Nashorn testing Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/01/22 Re: RFR(XXS): 8134933: re-enable LambdaFormEditor assertions in Nashorn testing Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/01/22 RFR(XXS): 8134933: re-enable LambdaFormEditor assertions in Nashorn testing Michael Haupt
• 2016/01/22 Re: Review request for backport of JDK-8144020: Remove long as an internal numeric type Michael Haupt
• 2016/01/21 Re: Review request for JDK-8133299: Nashorn Java adapters should not early bind to functions Marcus Lagergren
• 2016/01/21 Re: Review request for backport of JDK-8143896: java.lang.Long is implicitly converted to double Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/01/21 Re: Review request for backport of JDK-8143896: java.lang.Long is implicitly converted to double Marcus Lagergren
• 2016/01/21 Re: Review request for JDK-8147845: Varargs Array functions still leaking longs Attila Szegedi
• 2016/01/21 Re: Review request for JDK-8147845: Varargs Array functions still leaking longs Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/01/21 Re: Review request for JDK-8147845: Varargs Array functions still leaking longs Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/01/21 Re: Review request for JDK-8147845: Varargs Array functions still leaking longs Michael Haupt
• 2016/01/21 Re: Review request for JDK-8147845: Varargs Array functions still leaking longs Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/01/21 Review request for JDK-8147845: Varargs Array functions still leaking longs Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/01/20 Review request for backport of JDK-8143896: java.lang.Long is implicitly converted to double Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/01/20 Re: RFR(M): 8144113: enable jjs testing Michael Haupt
• 2016/01/20 Review request for backport of JDK-8144020: Remove long as an internal numeric type Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/01/20 Re: RFR(M): 8144113: enable jjs testing Attila Szegedi
• 2016/01/20 Re: RFR(M): 8144113: enable jjs testing Michael Haupt
• 2016/01/19 Re: RFR(M): 8144113: enable jjs testing Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/01/19 Re: Review request for JDK-8147630: Wrong test result pushed to 8u-dev Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/01/19 Re: Review request for JDK-8147630: Wrong test result pushed to 8u-dev Attila Szegedi
• 2016/01/19 Review request for JDK-8147630: Wrong test result pushed to 8u-dev Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/01/19 Re: Review request for backport of JDK-8144131: ArrayData.getInt implementations do not convert to int32 Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/01/19 Review request for backport of JDK-8144131: ArrayData.getInt implementations do not convert to int32 Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/01/19 Re: Review request for backport of JDK-8144131: ArrayData.getInt implementations do not convert to int32 Attila Szegedi
• 2016/01/19 Re: RFR(M): 8144113: enable jjs testing Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/01/19 Re: Review request for JDK-8133299: Nashorn Java adapters should not early bind to functions Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/01/19 Re: Review request for JDK-8133299: Nashorn Java adapters should not early bind to functions Attila Szegedi
• 2016/01/19 Re: RFR(M): 8144113: enable jjs testing Attila Szegedi
• 2016/01/19 RFR(M): 8144113: enable jjs testing Michael Haupt
• 2016/01/18 Re: Review request for JDK-8133299: Nashorn Java adapters should not early bind to functions Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/01/18 Re: Review request for JDK-8146274: Thread spinning on WeakHashMap.getEntry() with concurrent use of nashorn Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/01/18 Re: RFR(S): 8145305: fix Nashorn shebang handling on Cygwin Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• 2016/01/18 Re: RFR(S): 8145305: fix Nashorn shebang handling on Cygwin Michael Haupt
• 2016/01/15 Re: Review request for JDK-8133299: Nashorn Java adapters should not early bind to functions Attila Szegedi
• 2016/01/15 Re: Review request for JDK-8146274: Thread spinning on WeakHashMap.getEntry() with concurrent use of nashorn Attila Szegedi
• 2016/01/15 Re: Review request for JDK-8146274: Thread spinning on WeakHashMap.getEntry() with concurrent use of nashorn Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/01/15 Re: Review request for JDK-8146274: Thread spinning on WeakHashMap.getEntry() with concurrent use of nashorn Attila Szegedi
• 2016/01/15 Re: Review request for JDK-8146274: Thread spinning on WeakHashMap.getEntry() with concurrent use of nashorn Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/01/15 Re: Review request for JDK-8146274: Thread spinning on WeakHashMap.getEntry() with concurrent use of nashorn Michael Haupt
• 2016/01/15 Review request for JDK-8146274: Thread spinning on WeakHashMap.getEntry() with concurrent use of nashorn Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/01/15 Re: RFR(S): 8145305: fix Nashorn shebang handling on Cygwin Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2016/01/15 RFR(S): 8145305: fix Nashorn shebang handling on Cygwin Michael Haupt
• 2016/01/14 Re: RFR(S): 8036977: Make process singleton options to be context wide Marcus Lagergren

• Earlier messages
• Later messages