Hi Fred,

I haven't read this draft, in fact, I'm reading RFC3002.


In section 4.3.4, it reads,

   It was recommended that an effort be made to eliminate any
   requirement for NAT in an IPv6 Internet.  The IAB believes that the
   IPv6 address space is large enough to preclude any requirement for
   private address allocation [55] or address translation due to address
   space shortage [15].  Therefore, accomplishing this should primarily
   require installing and enforcing proper address allocation policy on
   registry and service providers.  It was recommended to establish
   policies requiring service providers to allocate a sufficient
   quantity of global addresses for a sites use.  The feeling was that
   NAT should be easily eliminated provided efficient strategies are
   defined to address renumbering [17,62] and mobility [37] issues.

My questions here are,

Is the requirement for NAT in IPv6 Internet avoidless?
Cann't we (service provider) find appropriate policy or strategies to
address this problem?
Or the Internet situation has changed?

Thanks!
Xiangsong

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Fred Baker
> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 6:39 AM
> To: NAT66 HappyFunBall
> Subject: [nat66] Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-mrw-nat66-08.txt
> 
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> > From: [email protected]
> > Date: February 28, 2011 2:30:03 PM PST
> > To: [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected], [email protected]
> > Subject: New Version Notification - draft-mrw-nat66-08.txt
> >
> > New version (-08) has been submitted for draft-mrw-nat66-08.txt.
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mrw-nat66-08.txt
> >
> >
> > Diff from previous version:
> > http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-mrw-nat66-08
> >
> > IETF Secretariat.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nat66 mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66

_______________________________________________
nat66 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66

Reply via email to