On Mar 6, 2011, at 8:08 PM, Xiangsong Cui wrote: > It seems to me that you are taking IPv6 address as "ID + locator", prefix is > the location and IID is the Identifier.
GSE, and its descendants 8+8, ILNP, and NPTv6, all consider the prefix to be the locator and the IID the identifier. That, btw, is the origin of the term "Interface Identifier" in RFC 4291, and the logic that led us to allocating /64s to LANs - along with the fact that MAC addresses in some LANs are longer than 48 bits. > I'm not sure, but I don't think IDv6 would accelerate IPv6 development. > In my impression, the slow IPv6 transition is because there are too many > NAT64 NATs, so the participants have no strong motivation to develop IPv6. I would disagree with that; the development of an IPv6 Internet has been hampered primarily by the lack of pressing need for one. As we run out of IPv4 address space, businesses that depend on periodic allocations of new address space have been taking pretty strong steps to deploy IPv6. _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
