Dear Michael, It seems to me that you somehow mistargeted this last message. Probably it should go to some different topic :)
WBR, Andrii On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 1:52 PM, 'Michael Hunger' via Neo4j <neo4j@googlegroups.com> wrote: > There is some of that in apoc.cypher.mapParallel, but it's not as performant > as it should be, I have to check again what keeps it back from performing. > > How many CPUs do you have on your system? > > Cheers, Michael > > > On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 10:53 AM, unrealadmin23 via Neo4j > <neo4j@googlegroups.com> wrote: >> >> So is there a generic way of parallel threading for searches ? >> >> match (n:Entity)-[*4]-(p) where p.name contains "......." Takes a long >> time on my system and uses 1 thread.... >> >> If so, could this not be part of apoc or the like ? >> >> >> On Friday, 31 March 2017 15:56:07 UTC+1, Max De Marzi Jr. wrote: >>> >>> This POC hits a bunch of your points => >>> https://maxdemarzi.com/2017/01/06/multi-threading-a-traversal/ >>> >>> On Friday, March 31, 2017 at 3:58:26 AM UTC-5, unreal...@googlemail.com >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> So I would like to see a benchmark that majors on the 'deep search' >>>> performance of the various graph databases, which would draw upon: >>>> >>>> 1. Multi threading (for single searches mainly) but for other operations >>>> also - limited by the capability of the graph DB >>>> 2. In memory enhancements.- limited by the capability of the graph DB >>>> 3. The ability to pointer chase (for optimisation) - limited by the >>>> capability of the graph DB >>>> 4. The graph data should comprise complex relationships, not just >>>> straight forward hierarchies. >>>> 5. The benchmark should be scalable (including the ability to fully >>>> utilise very capable nodes). >>>> >>>> Wayne. >>>> >>>> On Thursday, 30 March 2017 21:49:27 UTC+1, Andrii Stesin wrote: >>>>> >>>>> http://orientdb.com/orientdb-vs-neo4j/ >>>>> >>>>> what are they speaking about, I wonder?! >>>>> >>>>> WBR, >>>>> Andrii >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Neo4j" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to neo4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "Neo4j" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/neo4j/sx_2kxuWz8I/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > neo4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to neo4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
