Scale to do what exactly? On Monday, April 17, 2017 at 1:47:15 AM UTC-5, unreal...@googlemail.com wrote: > > I have 128 threads. However access to systems with much more than this is > an option. Currently though, I cannot get Neo4j to scale.... > > Wayne > > On Monday, 3 April 2017 11:52:17 UTC+1, Michael Hunger wrote: >> >> There is some of that in apoc.cypher.mapParallel, but it's not as >> performant as it should be, I have to check again what keeps it back from >> performing. >> >> How many CPUs do you have on your system? >> >> Cheers, Michael >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 10:53 AM, unrealadmin23 via Neo4j < >> ne...@googlegroups.com> wrote: >> >>> So is there a generic way of parallel threading for searches ? >>> >>> match (n:Entity)-[*4]-(p) where p.name contains "......." Takes a >>> long time on my system and uses 1 thread.... >>> >>> If so, could this not be part of apoc or the like ? >>> >>> >>> On Friday, 31 March 2017 15:56:07 UTC+1, Max De Marzi Jr. wrote: >>>> >>>> This POC hits a bunch of your points => >>>> https://maxdemarzi.com/2017/01/06/multi-threading-a-traversal/ >>>> >>>> On Friday, March 31, 2017 at 3:58:26 AM UTC-5, unreal...@googlemail.com >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> So I would like to see a benchmark that majors on the 'deep search' >>>>> performance of the various graph databases, which would draw upon: >>>>> >>>>> 1. Multi threading (for single searches mainly) but for other >>>>> operations also - limited by the capability of the graph DB >>>>> 2. In memory enhancements.- limited by the capability of the graph DB >>>>> 3. The ability to pointer chase (for optimisation) - limited by the >>>>> capability of the graph DB >>>>> 4. The graph data should comprise complex relationships, not just >>>>> straight forward hierarchies. >>>>> 5. The benchmark should be scalable (including the ability to fully >>>>> utilise very capable nodes). >>>>> >>>>> Wayne. >>>>> >>>>> On Thursday, 30 March 2017 21:49:27 UTC+1, Andrii Stesin wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://orientdb.com/orientdb-vs-neo4j/ >>>>>> >>>>>> what are they speaking about, I wonder?! >>>>>> >>>>>> WBR, >>>>>> Andrii >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Neo4j" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to neo4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >>
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to neo4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
