I have 128 threads. However access to systems with much more than this is 
an option. Currently though, I cannot get Neo4j to scale....

Wayne

On Monday, 3 April 2017 11:52:17 UTC+1, Michael Hunger wrote:
>
> There is some of that in apoc.cypher.mapParallel, but it's not as 
> performant as it should be, I have to check again what keeps it back from 
> performing.
>
> How many CPUs do you have on your system?
>
> Cheers, Michael
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 10:53 AM, unrealadmin23 via Neo4j <
> ne...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> So is there a generic way of parallel threading for searches ?
>>
>> match (n:Entity)-[*4]-(p) where p.name contains "......."   Takes a long 
>> time on my system and uses 1 thread....
>>
>> If so, could this not be part of apoc or the like ?
>>
>>
>> On Friday, 31 March 2017 15:56:07 UTC+1, Max De Marzi Jr. wrote:
>>>
>>> This POC hits a bunch of your points => 
>>> https://maxdemarzi.com/2017/01/06/multi-threading-a-traversal/
>>>
>>> On Friday, March 31, 2017 at 3:58:26 AM UTC-5, unreal...@googlemail.com 
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> So I would like to see a benchmark that majors on  the 'deep search' 
>>>> performance of the various graph databases, which would draw upon:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Multi threading (for single searches mainly) but for other 
>>>> operations also - limited by the capability of the graph DB 
>>>> 2. In memory enhancements.- limited by the capability of the graph DB
>>>> 3. The ability to pointer chase (for optimisation)  - limited by the 
>>>> capability of the graph DB
>>>> 4. The graph data should comprise complex relationships,  not just 
>>>> straight forward hierarchies. 
>>>> 5. The benchmark should be scalable (including the ability to fully 
>>>> utilise very capable nodes).
>>>>
>>>> Wayne.
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, 30 March 2017 21:49:27 UTC+1, Andrii Stesin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://orientdb.com/orientdb-vs-neo4j/
>>>>>
>>>>> what are they speaking about, I wonder?!
>>>>>
>>>>> WBR,
>>>>> Andrii
>>>>>
>>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Neo4j" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to neo4j+un...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Neo4j" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to neo4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to