Thanks Martin; I am starting a new thread for this Dekatron project.
I will post tomorrow after some tests.
Peter

On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 5:10 PM Dekatron42 <martin.forsb...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> If you can get your hands on a GSA10G you could even let it drive a Nixie
> at the same time, or you can use one of the A-201 Polyatrons with a Nixie.
>
> You can use a set/reset circuit for each cathode on the GSA10G (or any
> selector dekatron) as well as on the auxilliary anodes of the A-201, it
> will however require a few components for each of the cathodes/auxilliary
> anodes to be able to set/reset them to each position, an extra transistor
> will let you drive a Nixie too on an ordinary selector dekatron. You can
> find the circuit for the set/reset capability for the A-201 Polyatron here
> on the forum as I've published it here a few years ago. You should let the
> guide electrodes at their bias voltage so that they don't float and disturb
> the dekatron/polyatron from working properly.
>
> For the selector dekatron you can use the circuit below (taken from an
> Advance Rate Meter Counter), it will drive a Nixie at the same time as
> having the capability to set/reset the dekatron to each cathode - you'll of
> course need 10 of these circiuts for a GS10C dekatron. The circuit was
> designed for use with a GS10H dekatron together with a GR10K Nixie. Don't
> leave out either D1 or D2 from the circuit as they are there for protecting
> from positive/negative pulses that would upset the circuit and blow Q3. If
> you use a GSA10G you can skip Q3 as the GSA10G will drive the Nixie
> directly. You will probably have to adjust R4 & R7 depending on what
> dekatron you use but the rest of the components should be fine with any
> dekatron, the reason for adjusting these two resistors is to accomodate for
> the correct cathode current to pass to common ground both during normal
> counting (R7) and during set/reset (R4). R2 should be a 1W resistor as it
> will have just above 0.6W power or use two resistors in series for enough
> power rating. The circuit is designed to make a short enough pulse for
> set/reset and not for a continous voltage on the cathode of the dekatron,
> the glow will stay on the set/reset cathode due to current flowing through
> D2 & R7 to common ground (current also flows through R4 & D1 to common
> ground but the main part of the current flows through D2 & R7). I've used
> this circuit in many experiments and it works very well.
>
> /Martin
>
> [image: Dekatron-Nixie-SET-Circuit.JPG]
>
> On Saturday, 13 February 2021 at 21:31:35 UTC+1 Jon wrote:
>
>> Actually, musing on it further, you might have a bit of a problem with
>> the 74141 and dekatrons. I suspect the chip output transistors won't have a
>> high enough Vceo to cope if you try to use the typical dekatron anode
>> voltages. Likely you're either going to need to play around to run the tube
>> at lower anode voltages (not sure that'll work very well) or switch to a
>> mixture of logic and discrete components - something along the lines of a
>> 7442 driving MPSA42 (you'll need an inverter between them).
>>
>> The GR10A is the best option here I think - that should work fine with
>> 74141.
>>
>> Jon.
>>
>> On Saturday, February 13, 2021 at 3:16:35 PM UTC Jon wrote:
>>
>>> >Can a Dekatron be driven like a Nixie from a 74141 instead of using the
>>> steering electrodes?
>>>
>>> I've not actually done the experiment in the way that you say, but the
>>> answer should be 'yes'. You'll need a selector dekatron though where all
>>> the main cathodes are brought out to their own individual pins. So GS10C /
>>> 6476 / A101 for example rather than GC10B / 6802 / OG4.
>>>
>>> There is actually a dekatron-lookalike, the GR10A, which is designed to
>>> be used like this - it's essentially a GS10C without the guide electrodes
>>> (different base, but that's a detail).
>>>
>>> Jon.
>>>
>>> On Saturday, February 13, 2021 at 2:38:21 PM UTC bung...@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alex; you are missing the point. Neither of the circuits shown in
>>>> various data sheets work properly!
>>>> The circuit that does work and the one I'm using has the capacitor
>>>> connected to the other side of the resistor.
>>>> A quick question so it does not get lost below: Can a Dekatron be
>>>> driven like a Nixie from a 74141 instead of using the steering electrodes?
>>>>
>>>> [image: 8453_LR.jpg]
>>>> [image: 8453 Board_LR.jpg]
>>>> Each tube has its own small circuit board that connects to a PIC on my
>>>> power supply by a 6 wire (+5v, Gnd, 4 BCD) harness. and by a separate two
>>>> wire harness if High Voltage is needed (the 2 pin 0.2" spacing header on
>>>> the perfboard above). My wires are fed through a hole and loop down to be
>>>> soldered to provide strain relief. All boards mount on two spacers. Some
>>>> mount directly on the back of the tube if space allows. Any board can be
>>>> removed in less than a minute, usually 2 screws but 4 screws where the
>>>> board is not attached to the tube, then pull one or two connectors.
>>>> [image: Wiring_LR.jpg]
>>>> The E1T tube does not count in sync with the others because it is
>>>> clocked, not fed by the common BCD bus. It takes time for the filaments to
>>>> warm up so it needs a reset every decade to get it in sync. However it
>>>> cannot count backwards without a lot of effort I'm not about to expend so
>>>> it stays like this. The hole below is for LED displays.
>>>> [image: Display Demo_LR.jpg]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 3:38 AM Alex <ajlg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Just a thought, maybe the diodes originally used had a much different
>>>>> reverse leakage which, in half wave rectified setup, caused the polarity 
>>>>> in
>>>>> the tube to flip slightly - at low leakage current levels - and thus
>>>>> extinguish it more cleanly between ripples. Modern(!) silicon (verses
>>>>> germanium) may be too sharp for it? I think your full wave design is
>>>>> probably best anyhow, the half wave was likely a cost compremise!
>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>
>>>>> On Friday, 12 February 2021 at 20:08:35 UTC bung...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I tried Rk at 12k and 22k and it is still erratic.
>>>>>> Next I went back to full wave and connected it to my display chassis
>>>>>> that runs from a PIC that counts at various speeds. I see the circuit 
>>>>>> only
>>>>>> counts slowly but at 10/sec it fails. No flickering, it just does not 
>>>>>> count.
>>>>>> I changed the capacitor to the other side of Rk and it works
>>>>>> perfectly.
>>>>>> I can't believe it is a typo carried through three documents but
>>>>>> companies have been known to intentionally place errors to cause grief to
>>>>>> anyone trying to steal their designs.
>>>>>> This circuit works.
>>>>>> [image: 8453 Circuit.jpg]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Friday, February 12, 2021 at 12:47:29 PM UTC-5 Dekatron42 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks, I've never looked at that particular datasheet previously,
>>>>>>> only the Philips ones even though I have a few Amperex stamped Z550M's.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In this document: https://www.dos4ever.com/Z550M/Z550M2.pdf (a
>>>>>>> somewhat clearer PDF can be downloaded here:
>>>>>>> http://www.tube-tester.com/sites/nixie/dat_arch/Z550M_2.pdf) there
>>>>>>> is a paragraph on "Supply voltage" on page 120 where they mention a 
>>>>>>> minimum
>>>>>>> repetition frequency of 80 pulses per second as a minmum for proper
>>>>>>> operation - perhaps that is the reason why it doesn't work as well on 
>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>> half wave rectification. Maybe Amperex had some specially made to be 
>>>>>>> able
>>>>>>> to drive them at 117 VAC @ 60Hz?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /Martin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Friday, 12 February 2021 at 17:56:07 UTC+1 bung...@gmail.com
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Martin; See attached for data sheet. I have tried different
>>>>>>>> capacitors. They make no difference for either full wave or half wave -
>>>>>>>> full wave always works with no indication of problems and half wave
>>>>>>>> flickers all over the place and never works (unless I move the 
>>>>>>>> capacitor
>>>>>>>> connection).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bill van Dijk: I am in Canada, 60 Hz. Control grid?? See data sheet
>>>>>>>> attached.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I was hoping someone else would have tried these circuits. I have
>>>>>>>> used a 'scope to check the various signals and they look fine.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 9:06 AM Dekatron42 <martin....@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Which datasheet do you use? I only have information with the full
>>>>>>>>> wave rectifier.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What happens if you use a 470nF or 1uF capacitor with the half
>>>>>>>>> wave rectifier? I made some quick LTSpice simulations which shows 
>>>>>>>>> that a
>>>>>>>>> higher capacitor might work as the voltage seems to fall low enough 
>>>>>>>>> between
>>>>>>>>> each period, but only real tests can show if that works properly.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> /Martin
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 12 February 2021 at 14:13:47 UTC+1 bung...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Martin, I changed the circuit back to halfwave using a single
>>>>>>>>>> diode from the bridge rectifier and changing the capacitor. This was
>>>>>>>>>> absolute minimum change without moving anything else. Back came the
>>>>>>>>>> erratic flashing. So it's not the diode. It just does not like half 
>>>>>>>>>> wave.
>>>>>>>>>> My circuits are direct copies from the data sheet.
>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 5:21 PM Dekatron42 <martin....@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Nice that it works!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> My understanding is that they need rectified AC, with just a
>>>>>>>>>>> little smoothing so as not to make it a pure DC voltage, as they 
>>>>>>>>>>> extinguish
>>>>>>>>>>> during the portion of the voltage when it is to low to maintain the 
>>>>>>>>>>> glow,
>>>>>>>>>>> and they are re-ignited when the voltage rise again as long as a 
>>>>>>>>>>> trigger
>>>>>>>>>>> electrode has the correct voltage to initiate a glow, much like a 
>>>>>>>>>>> thyratron.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe you can find the reason for it working now compared to
>>>>>>>>>>> earlier failures if you check the voltage across the 
>>>>>>>>>>> Anode-Cathode-Ignition
>>>>>>>>>>> electrode with an oscilloscope?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I've also had some problems with CMOS ic's when I have had poor,
>>>>>>>>>>> or no, connection to VCC/GND on the power pins - the circuit worked 
>>>>>>>>>>> quite
>>>>>>>>>>> well until I touched some pins.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> /Martin
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, 11 February 2021 at 21:50:49 UTC+1
>>>>>>>>>>> bung...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I have solved the problem but I don't understand why.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Having tried all the suggestions except this, I went to a full
>>>>>>>>>>>> wave rectifier. It is not quite the same as the data sheet but 
>>>>>>>>>>>> does the
>>>>>>>>>>>> same thing.
>>>>>>>>>>>> It also has the capacitor connected per the data sheet, the
>>>>>>>>>>>> same as my half wave circuit that did not work.
>>>>>>>>>>>> This is rock solid with no indication of any other flickering.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I am using the first (worst) tube. Touching the glass has no 
>>>>>>>>>>>> effect.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Apparently the tube does not like half wave. Perhaps it was my
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1N4007 diode? They can switch too fast and maybe it needed a 
>>>>>>>>>>>> snubber.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I also tried DC from a variable regulated power supply (HP
>>>>>>>>>>>> 6448B up to 600 volt@1.5 amp, and no, I did not go that far).
>>>>>>>>>>>> That locked the display on one digit. The data sheet says it needs
>>>>>>>>>>>> rectified line, not DC.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I am running my tests from an HP supply for the 5v and an
>>>>>>>>>>>> isolation transformer driven by a Variac for the AC so I have full 
>>>>>>>>>>>> control
>>>>>>>>>>>> of all voltages.
>>>>>>>>>>>> This is my final schematic. It is driven by a PIC with parallel
>>>>>>>>>>>> connectors for each display. I used a PIC to generate the BCD 
>>>>>>>>>>>> because CMOS
>>>>>>>>>>>> would not drive the three 74141 for the Nixies. The PIC counts up 
>>>>>>>>>>>> and down
>>>>>>>>>>>> at varying speeds which would have been more difficult with CMOS.
>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: 8453 Circuit.jpg]
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:33 AM Dekatron42 <
>>>>>>>>>>>> martin....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Touching the glass means that you get a capacitive coupling
>>>>>>>>>>>>> which will upset them somewhat, there was a special socket made 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for this by
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philips which has a partial metal screen surrounding the tube. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The socket
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is nicknamed "der Kuss" , "The kiss", due to its form. I couldn't 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> find a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> photo on the Internet now but I know it exists as I have some in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> my storage
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and in an instrument that uses them. That instrument is called 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> PW4261
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timer, some photos of the externals can be found on the Internet. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On this
>>>>>>>>>>>>> socket all of the resistors are mounted flush to the pins to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> minimize the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> distance, but the capacitors and power supply is mounted some 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 40cm from the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tubes themselves, likewise there are long wires to the drivers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can also have a look at the manual for the PW4231 which I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> scanned that can be downloaded from here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://frank.pocnet.net/other/sos/Philips_PW4232.pdf if that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> can help you with the voltages for the drivers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> /Martin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, 11 February 2021 at 15:50:55 UTC+1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> bung...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I meant dekatron in my last reply to gregebert.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have 3 of these tubes, all apparently new (NOS).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Per your suggestion I tried the other two. One is almost
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perfect but flashes the 2 a bit when 8 is selected. The third is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perfect
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unless I hold the tube in my fingers by the glass where I get 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lots of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> random flashing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Remember that the really bad one works perfectly with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the capacitor moved as I mentioned. I don't know if touching the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> glass
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> affects it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   More later, I will be away this morning.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 2:10 AM Dekatron42 <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> martin....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you tried the circuit in the J.B Dance book below? Here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they use a center tapped transformer and also a much lower 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> value capacitor,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only 33nF versus 250nF in your circuit - I've only evere seen 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 33nF used in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> real instruments using these indicators.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quite a few of the Z550M/ZM1050 are broken internally, I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a box of them, and that seems to be due to the welding of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the internal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parts coming loose when shaken or hit hard (the same problem 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exists with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the B9012/NL9012 tubes - I have a few broken ones of those too 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> internal pieces that have come loose) - sometimes you can hear 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these loose
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pieces if you shake the tube very carefully close to your ear. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What usually
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happens is that a rather large round center piece comes loose 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worst case shortens some of the electrodes but usually only 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> makes it hard
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or impossible to get all digits to light up poperly and some of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trigger easier than others due to the distances between 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electrodes are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> differing, shaking the tube a little moves that effect around 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> digits will start to work and vice versa.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /Martin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: JBDance-Z550M.JPG]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, 11 February 2021 at 06:02:24 UTC+1 gregebert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you have an isolation transformer, can you put a scope
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the cathode line to verify the ripple is not excessive ? Rk 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Ck
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> create an RC filter around 77Hz, and the line is 50-60Hz, so 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there could be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some ripple.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, February 10, 2021 at 8:26:51 PM UTC-8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bung...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I tried varying it with absolutely no effect. It runs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perfectly at 5v with the capacitor moved to the other side of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the resistor.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However I was clocking slowly. It may not run at spec speed. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I seem to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remember reading of using 5 to 8 volts for the logic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The data sheet shows the following which I'm inclined to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe. I will try Ck directly on the pins tomorrow. Someone 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have tried this circuit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: 8453 Cct.JPG]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:12 PM gregebert <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> greg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suspect the differential voltage between lit vs non-lit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> numerals is too low. The CMOS device is basically driving 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grids to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> determine which cathode will be illuminated. I've seen 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> similar behavior
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with an A-101 dekatron. What voltage are you using for VDD ? 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is it 8V as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indicated on the schematic, or a more-conventional 5V ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, February 10, 2021 at 7:22:25 PM UTC-8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bung...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think you are wrong. The literature explains this tube
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is designed to be driven by 5v logic and it does work. The 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> steering
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electrodes are close to the Anode voltage which is grounded 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and only 5v
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pulses (square waves) are needed. Note all the cathodes are 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> connected
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> together internally.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I got to thinking about the C1 position. The data sheet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shows it per my schematic and I can't believe they made 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that mistake
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> several times including the hand drawn notes of the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> designer. I think maybe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I needed to have C1 directly on the socket pins and will 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> try that tomorrow.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your interest though but you are thinking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nixie Tubes, this is a special tube with steering 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electrodes..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 9:42 PM chuckrr <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chu...@all2easy.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That schematic is so wrong in so many ways.   You need
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> high voltage transistors operating the tube cathodes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You need high resistance drving the transistor bases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  You need a buffer such as 4049 or 4050 driving the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resistor, which in turn drives the transistor base.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only then would I dare to use the 4028....to operate the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buffer, which in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> turn operates the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transistor base via appropriate high resistance.  That
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is the only sure fire way I know of to attain noise-free 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CMOS logic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> driving cold cathode tubes.   That schematic there is a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> noisy deal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---- Original Message ----
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: "peter bunge" <bung...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: 2/10/2021 8:15:21 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: "neonixie-l" <neoni...@googlegroups.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: [neonixie-l] 8453/Z550M erratic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Using the schematic from the data sheet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: 8453 Circuit.jpg]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This works with the count moving around but other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> numbers flash erratically, especially close to the number 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is supposed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be lit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *When I moved  the bottom of C1 to the other side of R1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it works perfectly.  It is rock steady and does not care 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about line voltage
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or the 5v supply (shown above as 8v but used at 5v)*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If this is an error it is continued through all the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation and is consistent. Changing the value of C1 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up and down by 10
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had little effect but a smaller C1 helps a bit. My Rst are 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all directly on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the socket pins and the wires are all about 5 inches long.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have varied the line voltage with little effect.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any suggestions???
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emails from it, send an email to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neonixie-l+...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/b996ef0b-edbb-4c77-8ec1-57255dd58a82n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/b996ef0b-edbb-4c77-8ec1-57255dd58a82n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emails from it, send an email to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neonixie-l+...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/202102101842701.SM05295%40ADT-IM1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/202102101842701.SM05295%40ADT-IM1?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, send an email to neonixie-l+...@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/9543e23e-ebb0-46e7-8624-ddcf4a843667n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/9543e23e-ebb0-46e7-8624-ddcf4a843667n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, send an email to neonixie-l+...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/7085da7d-27dd-46f3-9bba-9e2d369dcc4fn%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/7085da7d-27dd-46f3-9bba-9e2d369dcc4fn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to neonixie-l+...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/ad3deb14-52ce-4b11-b048-dd6dea83bdban%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/ad3deb14-52ce-4b11-b048-dd6dea83bdban%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to neonixie-l+...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/dcd99e19-3b9c-406c-8057-d69f1547ce03n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/dcd99e19-3b9c-406c-8057-d69f1547ce03n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>>> Groups "neonixie-l" group.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>>> send an email to neonixie-l+...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/93f9a715-47dd-4f8b-8fd4-89e03e0bb06bn%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/93f9a715-47dd-4f8b-8fd4-89e03e0bb06bn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>>>>> Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/neonixie-l/uVu3BIr_9Uc/unsubscribe.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>>>>> neonixie-l+...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/06111dd3-86b7-454a-b34d-5b0488b3ec09n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/06111dd3-86b7-454a-b34d-5b0488b3ec09n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "neonixie-l" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/6285e13c-a2ff-4f4a-82f3-af3d871bf74en%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/6285e13c-a2ff-4f4a-82f3-af3d871bf74en%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/CAFxqQoJjNZjETVus6vdT0%2B1fQkbnR532FnfSogvrWQS%3Dqdi62g%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to