On 10/24/2010 06:32 PM, Simon Biggs wrote: > This is a false duality. The distinction between professional and amateur is > a problematic one, being a function of the economic system within which the > differentiation is made. Both sides of argument make their arguments from > false positions if their aim is to paint a black and white picture.
Is there a good definition or discussion online of what "professional" means in a Marxist context? I've been wondering about this for ages but Google is not my friend on this. Thanks. - Rob. _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
