Ladislav Lhotka <lho...@nic.cz> wrote: > Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> writes: > > > RFC 6020 section 9.9: > > > > The leafref type is used to reference a particular leaf instance in > > the data tree. The "path" substatement (Section 9.9.2) selects a set > > of leaf instances, and the leafref value space is the set of values > > of these leaf instances. > > > > I think the last statement above already clarifies this, no? > > I think this is a stricter constraint that addresses the > "require-instance true" case : possible leafref values are limited to > those that instances of the referenced leaf really have. > > 6020bis should IMO say something like this: > > The "path" substatement (Section 9.9.2) selects a set of leaf > instances. If the "require-instance" property (Section 9.9.3) is set to > "true", the leafref value space is the set of values of these leaf > instances. Otherwise, the leafref value MUST be a valid value of the > data type that is defined for the referenced leaf.
You were quicker than me ;) I agree with this. /martin > > Lada > > > > > /js > > > > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 02:08:05PM +0200, Balazs Lengyel wrote: > >> Hello, > >> I propose a small clarification to the yang draft as described below. > >> regards Balazs > >> -------- Forwarded Message -------- > >> > >> Subject: Re: Leafref and require-instance=false > >> Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 13:44:55 +0200 > >> From: Martin Bjorklund [1]<m...@tail-f.com> > >> To: [2]balazs.leng...@ericsson.com > >> > >> Balazs Lengyel [3]<balazs.leng...@ericsson.com> wrote: > >> > Hello Martin, > >> > Any thoughts on this? > >> > regards Balazs > >> > > >> > > >> > Hello Martin, > >> > If I have a leafref with require-instance=false which references an > >> > uint8 with range 1..10, and the leafref contains the value 20, can > >> > this be a valid configuration? > >> > As I see it, there is nothing in the draft that says this is not > >> > allowed. > >> > > >> > IMHO this should not be valid. You could add something like: > >> > "The leafref must have a value that is a possible allowed value for > >> > the referenced leaf." > >> > >> I agree, this makes sense! > >> > >> > >> /martin > >> > >> -- > >> Balazs Lengyel Ericsson Hungary Ltd. > >> Senior Specialist > >> ECN: 831 7320 > >> Mobile: +36-70-330-7909 email: [4]balazs.leng...@ericsson.com > >> > >> References > >> > >> Visible links > >> 1. mailto:m...@tail-f.com > >> 2. mailto:balazs.leng...@ericsson.com > >> 3. mailto:balazs.leng...@ericsson.com > >> 4. mailto:balazs.leng...@ericsson.com > > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> netmod mailing list > >> netmod@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > > > > > -- > > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > netmod mailing list > > netmod@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > -- > Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs > PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
